• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BECTON DICKINSON BD PEGASUS BL 22GA X 1.00IN PRN; INTRAVASCULAR CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BECTON DICKINSON BD PEGASUS BL 22GA X 1.00IN PRN; INTRAVASCULAR CATHETER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 383731
Device Problem Packaging Problem (3007)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 03/28/2024
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
H.3.If a device evaluation and/or device history review is completed, a supplemental report will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported that bd pegasus bl 22ga x 1.00in prn package was damaged/defective the following information was provided by the initial reporter: it was found that the packaging of the whole box of feima products was damaged.The customer opened two boxes of the products and found that all nine feima products had holes in the packaging in the upper right corner.It was found that the packaging of the whole box of feima products was damaged.The customer after unpacking two boxes of products, i found that all nine pegasus bottles had holes in the packaging in the upper right corner.
 
Event Description
It was found that the packaging of the whole box of feima products was damaged.The customer opened two boxes of the products and found that all nine feima products had holes in the packaging in the upper right corner.It was found that the packaging of the whole box of feima products was damaged.The customer after unpacking two boxes of products, i found that all nine pegasus bottles had holes in the packaging in the upper right corner.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
2 photos were received for this complaint.Both photos show a pegasus sample with its needle cover protruding out of the corner of the blister packaging.There are no severe dents or crushed packaging observed on the samples seen in the photo.From the photo investigation, there is almost no dent on crush on the samples.If there is a damaged cause by the machine, the blister packaging will likely be crushed.There was no reporting of faulty robot or machine conveyor during the production of this batch.4 samples were received for this complaint.All 4 have the top right corners torn at the bending area of the blister packaging.The forming area looks badly dented but could be caused by the container that the samples were returned in.The bottom web thickness, sealing width & packaging seal strength of the 4 returned samples were inspected.All the inspected data for bottom web thickness were within the specification of 0.0254mm min.All the inspected data for seal width were within the specification of 3.0mm min.All the inspected data for the packaging seal strength were within the specification of 4.50 ¿ 17.80mm.Sample 2 from the returned sample was sent for ftir along with a current production bottom web.The ftir results shows both materials were analyzed as polyethylene.Both material was equivalent to each other.There was a qn raised for loose prn and slide clamp for this batch.The batch was manually sorted, batch was released after re-audit has passed.If there was a torn blister packaging, it will likely be easily noticeable during the sorting and a qn will raise for damaged packaging.The sorting is done manually by man and no machine is involved in the sorting.According to the verbatim, there were 9 samples found by the customer.The email attached mentions that customer found 4 in one box and another box has 5 samples.Only 4 of the samples will be returned for investigation, the rest of the 5 samples will not be returned and investigated.From the email, the shelf cartons will not be returned for further investigation.There are no similar complaint on this complaint batch #3113663.From the above investigation, the root cause of the damaged blister packaging cannot be determined.The complaint trend will be tracked and monitored.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BD PEGASUS BL 22GA X 1.00IN PRN
Type of Device
INTRAVASCULAR CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BECTON DICKINSON
1 becton drive
franklin lakes NJ 07417
Manufacturer (Section G)
BECTON DICKINSON MEDICAL (SINGAPORE)
30 tuas avenue 2
singapore NJ 07417
Manufacturer Contact
helen cox (mdr)
75 north fairway drive
vernon hills, IL 60061
8473935694
MDR Report Key19169877
MDR Text Key341612568
Report Number2243072-2024-00562
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FOZ
UDI-Device Identifier00382903837311
UDI-Public(01)00382903837311
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
UNK
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/17/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other
Device Catalogue Number383731
Device Lot Number3113663
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/29/2024
Initial Date FDA Received04/24/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received05/17/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/20/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/11/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-