A second jada was placed/ patient did have a hysterectomy and is currently in the icu not doing well [device ineffective] no additional ae reported [no adverse event] case narrative: this spontaneous report originating from united states was received from an other health professional via clinical account specialist (cas) referring to a female patient of unknown age.The patient's past medical history, current condition, concomitant medications, past drugs and past drug reactions/allergies were not reported.This report concerns 1 patient and 2 devices.On (b)(6) 2024, the patient was placed with vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) #2 via vaginal route (lot and expiration date were not reported) for post-partum hemorrhage.A second vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) was placed and no further clarifying information was provided on the use of the second vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system).Patient did have a hysterectomy and was currently in the intensive care unit (icu) and not doing well (device ineffective).No additional adverse event (ae) reported (no adverse event).The patient sought medical attention.The action taken of vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) #2 was unknown.This case was linked to same patient linked case which included (event: jada was placed "somewhere at a greater than 3,000ml blood loss") (device ineffective) (reported in oars # o2404usa002811).A second jada was placed/ patient did have a hysterectomy and is currently in the icu not doing well (device ineffective) (reported in oars # o2404usa002813).When the lot number is unknown, a technical investigation of the specific manufacturing process which includes review of records associated with a known lot number cannot be performed.Medical device reporting criteria: serious injury.
|