Nurses reported the patient was found to have an inverted uterus [uterine inversion] the patient removed the device herself while suction was still connected to the device [unintentional medical device removal] case narrative: this spontaneous report originating from united states was received from territory manager (tm) referring to a non-pregnant female patient of unknown age.The patient's concurrent conditions, concomitant medications and past drug reactions/allergies were not reported.The patient's medical history included pregnancy, delivery, para 1 and gravida 2.This report concerns 1 patient(s) and 1 device(s).On an unknown date approximately in 2024 (reported as couple of months ago), the patient was placed with vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) via intravaginal route (after her first delivery) (lot# and expiration date were not reported) for postpartum hemorrhage.On an unknown date in 2024 (reported as couple of months ago), the system worked as normal, but the patient removed the device herself while suction was still connected to the device (unintentional medical device removal).The nurse reported that patient went to restroom for several hours later and felt something in her vagina.The nurse found that the patient had an inverted uterus (uterine inversion) which resulted in surgical intervention with hysterectomy.The patient was in hospital.On an unknown date in 2024, therapy with vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) was discontinued.It was unknown if the vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) was available for evaluation.The outcome of event uterine inversion was unknown.Upon internal review, the event uterine inversion was determined to be serious due required intervention (devices).Medical device reporting criteria: serious injury when the lot number is unknown, a technical investigation of the specific manufacturing process which includes review of records associated with a known lot number cannot be performed.
|