First jada system fell out when patient moved during two resuscitations [device expulsion].No additional ae provided [no adverse event].Case narrative: this spontaneous report originating from united states was received from a nurse via regional manager, referring to a non-pregnant female patient of unknown age.The patient's medical history included singleton fetal demise.The patient¿s current condition, concomitant medications and past drug reactions/allergies were not reported.This report concerns 1 patient(s) and 1 device(s).On unknown date, the patient was placed with vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) (lot #, serial # and expiration date were not reported) via intrauterine route for postpartum hemorrhage.On an unknown date, first vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) fell out when patient moved during two resuscitations (device expulsion).Another vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) was used but hemorrhage continued.Bakri uterine balloon was initiated, and patient was transferred to another hospital.The second vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) worked without issue, but the bleeding continued.After initial bleeding control by vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system), there was another bleeding episode.The patient sought medical attention.No product quality complaint (pqc) reported.No additional adverse event (ae) (no adverse event) or information provided.Therapy with vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) was withdrawn on an unknown date.The outcome of device expulsion was unknown.The reporter¿s causality assessment was not provided.Upon internal review, the event device expulsion was determined to be serious due required intervention (devices).This case was linked to same patient linked cases included (first vacuum-induced (jada system) fell out when patient moved during two resuscitations) (device expulsion) (reported in oars # (b)(4)).Vacuum-induced (jada system) was used but hemorrhage continued (device ineffective) (reported in oars # (b)(4)).When the lot number is unknown, a technical investigation of the specific manufacturing process which includes review of records associated with a known lot number cannot be performed.Medical device reporting criteria: serious injury.
|