DEPUY MITEK LLC US GRYPHON P BR DS ANCHOR W/OC; FASTENER, FIXATION, BIODEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number 210813 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Migration (4003)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 04/17/2024 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: d4 h4: the device expiration date and date of manufacture are unknown at this time.Udi: (b)(4).The product has not returned to depuy synthes mitek, however a photo was provided for review.The photo investigation revealed that the device anchor was outside of the tissue, additionally, the image quality is poor and no observations pertaining to the anchor structural state could be identified.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the gryphon p br ds anchor w/oc would contribute to the complained device issue.Based on the investigation findings, the potential cause can be traced to the procedural variables, such handling of the device or product interaction during procedure; it is possible that the depth penetration of the bone was not maintained; therefore, the anchor did not fully insert, and it was pulled out along with the device.As per the instructions for sue, bone stock must be adequate to allow proper and secure anchor placement.Incomplete insertion or poor bone quality may result in anchor pullout, and it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition.As part of depuy synthes mitek quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported by the sales rep in china that during an arthroscopic shoulder stabilization procedure the gryphon p br ds anchor w/oc device anchor was pulled out, and the anchor was broken off.Another device was used to complete the surgery.There were no adverse consequences to the patient.No additional information could be provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.D9, h3, h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once the device has been evaluated, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary: the product was returned to depuy synthes mitek for evaluation.The depuy synthes mitek team conducted a visual inspection of the returned device.Visual inspection found that gryphon p br ds anchor w/oc had the suture broken and frayed.No anomalies could be observed on the inserter nor on the anchor.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the gryphon p br ds anchor w/oc would contribute to the complained device issue.Based on the investigation findings, the potential cause can be traced to the procedural variables, such handling of the device or product interaction during procedure; it is possible that the depth penetration of the bone was not maintained; therefore, the anchor did not fully insert, and it was pulled out along with the device.As per the instructions for use, bone stock must be adequate to allow proper and secure anchor placement.Incomplete insertion or poor bone quality may result in anchor pullout, and it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition.As part of depuy synthes mitek quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|