|
Catalog Number LXMC15 |
Device Problems
Device Appears to Trigger Rejection (1524); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Dysphagia/ Odynophagia (1815); Pyrosis/Heartburn (1883)
|
Event Date 05/04/2021 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 4/25/2024.Attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.No lot number was provided therefore a device history could not be done.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent: what symptoms lead to the discovery of the discontinuous device? when did they begin? what was the date of the imaging which showed the discontinuous linx? if available, please share a copy of this imaging.Please send to: productcompliant1@its.Jnj.Com what is the device lot number? was the device initially effective in controlling reflux? were any events associated with the onset of symptoms (vomiting, retching, trauma, surgery)? did the patient have any other surgeries in the area? was any additional imaging performed since device implant? does the device appear to be in a continuous annular state in these images? we are interested in establishing a window when the device may have become discontinuous.Please share any additional images.Prior to linx placement, did the patient have an egd, ph, and manometry studies done? if yes, could you please share the results? did the patient have an autoimmune disease? is the patient currently taking steroids / immunosuppressive drugs? did the patient have any pre-existing dysphagia or other conditions (other than gerd)? how severe was the dysphagia/odynophagia before intervention? were there any intra-operative complications during implant? was there any hiatal or crural repair done at the same time as the implant? this report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a broken linx discovered during surgery.Reason for removal, dysphagia.Egd (b)(6) 2023- lose nissen, bile reflux, device found to be broken during surgery on (b)(6) 2024.The patient did not go under any mri.The patient did not receive a replacement.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 5/6/2024.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: what symptoms lead to the discovery of the discontinuous device? when did they begin? what was the date of the imaging which showed the discontinuous linx? if available, please share a copy of this imaging.Please send to: (b)(4).What is the device lot number? was the device initially effective in controlling reflux? were any events associated with the onset of symptoms (vomiting, retching, trauma, surgery)? did the patient have any other surgeries in the area? was any additional imaging performed since device implant? does the device appear to be in a continuous annular state in these images? we are interested in establishing a window when the device may have become discontinuous.Please share any additional images.Prior to linx placement, did the patient have an egd, ph, and manometry studies done? if yes, could you please share the results? did the patient have an autoimmune disease? is the patient currently taking steroids / immunosuppressive drugs? did the patient have any pre-existing dysphagia or other conditions (other than gerd)? how severe was the dysphagia/odynophagia before intervention? were there any intra-operative complications during implant? was there any hiatal or crural repair done at the same time as the implant? answer: no further information available.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 5/15/2024.The device upon which this medwatch is based has been received, however, the evaluation is not yet complete.Any further information derived from the evaluation will be submitted in a supplemental 3500a form.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 5/16/2024.Investigation summary: overall review of the device function and dimensions show no anomalies from a device that has been reasonably changed as part of the explant procedure.Visual analysis was consistent with an explanted device, some tooling marks were noted in some beads.Link length and tensile force were found to meet the applicable specifications.No discontinuity was found in the device, however, the device was received in three parts and during the analysis, it was noted to have cut wires that appear to be caused by a surgical instrument.Overall, no analysis conclusions relevant to the patient experience were found.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: the event description states that the device was found to be discontinuous.However, when the device was received the device was not found to be discontinuous.How did they know the device was discontinuous pre-operatively? are there any photos that you can share with the discontinuous device? if yes, please send them to (b)(6).Answer: no additional information provided.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|