|
Catalog Number UNK MECHANICAL HEART VALVE |
Device Problems
Off-Label Use (1494); Device Stenosis (4066)
|
Patient Problems
Dyspnea (1816); Tricuspid Valve Stenosis (2113)
|
Event Date 04/04/2024 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Investigation is not yet complete.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.Literature attachment: article title revisiting echocardiographic features of prosthetic heart valves: the necessity of correct differentiation of mono-leaflet vs.Bileaflet mechanical heart valves in a case report d4: the udi number is not known as the part and lot number were not provided.
|
|
Event Description
|
The article, "revisiting echocardiographic features of prosthetic heart valves: the necessity of correct differentiation of mono-leaflet vs.Bileaflet mechanical heart valves in a case report", was reviewed.The article presented a case study of a 65-year-old female patient with prior mitral valve replacement with 27mm mono-leaflet björk¿shiley tilting-disk valve.It was reported that on an unknown date, a 31mm unknown st.Jude medical/abbott mechanical valve was chosen for an off label procedure for tricuspid valve replacement.It was then reported on an unknown date, during a routine one year follow visit, the patient was referred for comprehensive assessment of mechanical valves due to mild dyspnea.Echocardiography showed the tricuspid mean gradient of the st.Jude/abbott mechanical valve was 5.3mmhg.With no evidence of paravalvular leak.[the primary and corresponding author was arman soltani moghadam, department of cardiology, imam khomeini hospital complex, tehran university of medical sciences, keshavarz boulevard, tehran, iran, with corresponding email: arman91as@yahoo.Com].
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
As reported in a research article, revisiting echocardiographic features of prosthetic heart valves: the necessity of correct differentiation of mono-leaflet vs.Bileaflet mechanical heart valves in a case report.A more comprehensive assessment could not be performed as the event was non-contemporaneously reported through a literature review and no device was received for analysis.Based on the information received, the cause of the reported incident could not be conclusively determined.Please note, per regent mechanical heart valve, instructions for use, " indications: the sjm regent¿ mechanical heart valve is intended for use as a replacement valve in patients with a diseased, damaged, or malfunctioning aortic valve.This device may also be used to replace a previously implanted aortic prosthetic heart valve." this is considered as an off-label use of the device.However, it was unable to determine if the off-label use contributed to the reported incident.Therefore, a letter will not be provided to address the deviation from the ifu.Literature attachment: revisiting echocardiographic features of prosthetic heart valves: the necessity of correct differentiation of mono-leaflet vs.Bileaflet mechanical heart valves in a case report.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|