BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS) BD MAX¿ SYSTEM, BD MAX¿ INSTRUMENT; INSTRUMENTATION FOR CLINICAL MULTIPLEX TEST SYSTEMS
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number 441916 |
Device Problem
False Positive Result (1227)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 04/09/2024 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
There were multiple medical device types.The information for each additional type is as follows: d.2.Medical device type: nqx, ooi, ozn.There were multiple pma/510k numbers: g.5.Pma / 510(k)#: k111860, k120138, k130470.H3.A device evaluation is anticipated but has not yet begun.Upon completion of the investigation, a supplemental report will be filed.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during use of the bd max¿ system, bd max¿ instrument, there was a mdr-tb false positive patient result.The pcr curve was unusual, so the test was repeated, and the result was mdr-tb negative.There was no report of patient impact.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during use of the bd max¿ system, bd max¿ instrument, there was a mdr-tb false positive patient result.The pcr curve was unusual, so the test was repeated, and the result was mdr-tb negative.There was no report of patient impact.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H.6.Investigation summary: the complaint alleges the bd max instrument had "false positives".Customer reported that they are witnessing suspected false positive results for the mdr-tb assay.The customer instrument run database was provided to bd service and quality for further analysis which did not reveal any trends indicating an instrument performance issue.A bd fse was dispatched to the customer site where they performed an instrument health check and did not identify any functional issues.An instrument preventative maintenance (pm) service was performed, and the instrument was successfully qualified for customer use.This complaint is unconfirmed as the issue was unable to be reproduced and the instrument was found to be operating within bd specifications.The root cause of the issue was unable to be determined with the information provided.Sample analysis consisted of the customer instrument database.Analysis by bd quality did not reveal any evidence of an instrument performance issue.Review of the device history record for the instrument is not required because this complaint does not allege an early life failure or failure at installation and the complaint is unconfirmed, thus a dhr review would yield no useful information.Service history review was performed for the instrument and no additional cases were observed for the complaint failure mode reported.Bd quality will continue to closely monitor for trends associated with this complaint.No new risks or hazards, or changes to existing risks/hazards, were identified as a result of this complaint.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|