• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ABBOTT MEDICAL MITRACLIP G4 CLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM (MDR); MITRAL VALVE REPAIR DEVICES

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ABBOTT MEDICAL MITRACLIP G4 CLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM (MDR); MITRAL VALVE REPAIR DEVICES Back to Search Results
Catalog Number CDS0706-XTW
Device Problem Unintended Movement (3026)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 04/04/2024
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation is not yet complete.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a patient presented with grade 4 mixed mitral regurgitation (mr) and frayed tissue for a mitraclip procedure.Both clips passed establish final arm angle (efaa) during prep.The first xtw clip [lot 40220r1012] was placed in the middle of the valve and passed efaa before lock line removal, at a 20 degree arm angle.The lock line was removed and efaa was checked.While going to neutral with the arm positioner, the clip relaxed about 10 degrees during efaa.The clip continued to open.The arm positioner was tightened down and the clip was deployed with grade >1 mr.After deployment the the mr was grade 3+ and the clip opened to about 30 degrees.The second clip, an nt, was unable to grasp due to frayed tissue.Eventually, one grasp was achieved, but there was too much residual mr.The nt was exchanged for an xt as the second clip.The xt clip achieved a grasp medially on the valve and the deployment sequence was started.Both efaas were successful and the clip arm angle was 20 degrees.During delivery catheter shaft detachment, as the arm positioner was turned to expose the release pin groove, the clip began to open.After deployment, the clip arm angle was about 35 degrees.The mr was reduced to grade 3-4.Both clips remained stable.There was no clinically significant delay or adverse patient effect.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Corrected information: h6 health effect - clinical code: code 4582 removed.Corrected information: h6 health effect - impact code: code 2199 removed.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.Attachment medwatch report #(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Subsequent to the initial report.It was reported that a patient presented with grade 4 mixed mitral regurgitation (mr), leaflet length of 8mm, and poor leaflet integrity for a mitraclip procedure.Both clips passed establish final arm angle (efaa) during prep.The first xtw clip [lot 40220r1012] was placed on a2/p2 (anterior and posterior 2) segments and passed efaa before lock line removal, at a 20-degree arm angle.There was no residual mr, and the mean mitral pressure gradient was 3mmhg.The lock line was removed and efaa was checked.While going to neutral with the arm positioner, the clip relaxed about 10 degrees.The clip continued to open.The arm positioner was tightened down, and the clip was deployed with grade >1 mr.After deployment, the mr was grade 3+ and the clip opened to about 30 degrees.A partial flail chord was noted.The second clip, an nt, was unable to grasp due to frayed tissue from the xtw opening.Eventually, one grasp was achieved, but there was too much residual mr.The partial flail chord had worsened due to poor tissue integrity and the additional grasps.The nt was exchanged for an xt [40219r1068] as the second clip.The xt clip achieved a grasp medially on the valve and the deployment sequence was started.Both efaas were successful, and the clip arm angle was 20 degrees.During delivery catheter shaft detachment, as the arm positioner was turned to expose the release pin groove, the clip began to open.After deployment, the clip arm angle was about 35 degrees.The mr was reduced to grade 3-4.Both clips remained stable.There remained a residual flail segment in between the 2 implanted clips with eccentric mr.At this point, given the tissue integrity, the decision was made to stop here and consider surgical intervention versus plugging on a later date.Given the hemodynamic support (vasopressors) that the patient required while intubated and sedated, and the hemodynamic decline starting from the first clip opening, and progressing from tissue injury and inability to adequately reduce mr from subsequent clips, a balloon pump was placed via the left femoral artery.No additional information was provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MITRACLIP G4 CLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM (MDR)
Type of Device
MITRAL VALVE REPAIR DEVICES
Manufacturer (Section D)
ABBOTT MEDICAL
5050 nathan lane n
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer (Section G)
ABBOTT VASCULAR, REG # 3005070406
3885 bohannon drive
menlo park CA 94025
Manufacturer Contact
karen krouse
5050 nathan lane n
plymouth, MN 55442
6517565400
MDR Report Key19210221
MDR Text Key341364087
Report Number2135147-2024-01901
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NKM
UDI-Device Identifier05415067037381
UDI-Public(01)05415067037381(17)250218(10)40220R1012
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P100009
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/29/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberCDS0706-XTW
Device Lot Number40220R1012
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/04/2024
Initial Date FDA Received04/29/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured02/20/2024
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
STEERABLE GUIDE CATHETER
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age80 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-