The article, ¿free-floating left atrial ball thrombus following transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair with the mitraclip device¿, presents a case study of an 80-year-old man with severe secondary functional mitral regurgitation (mr), previous myocardial infarction, long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation and heart failure for a mitraclip procedure.Transesophageal echocardiography (tee) showed a severe mr jet between the a2 and p2 (anterior and posterior scallops 2).One xtw was implanted and the mr was reduced to trivial.The mitral valve orifice area (mva) decreased from 6.66 to 2.66 cm2.And mean mitral pressure gradient increased from 1.0 to 3.0 mm hg after mitraclip therapy.The patient was prescribed apixaban to manage atrial fibrillation.Ten months after mitraclip therapy, the patient was switched from apixaban to warfarin because his renal function had deteriorated.Fourteen months after mitraclip therapy, tte showed a free-floating mass in the left atrium (la) which intermittently obstructed the mitral valve orifice.The patient¿s mr was mild, with a mean mitral pressure gradient of 3.0 mm hg.The patient underwent emergency surgical removal of the mass in the la, and la appendage occlusion.Histopathological examination of the excised mass revealed an organized thrombus and the diagnoses was la ball thrombus (labt).The patient had no embolic event and was discharged and prescribed apixaban for 2 weeks post-surgery.In conclusion, mitraclip therapy reduces mr and mva and increases the mitral valve pressure gradient, affecting hemodynamics and stagnating the la blood flow.Atrial fibrillation and inadequate anticoagulation can increase the risk of labt formation.To date, there are no appropriate recommendations for postprocedural antithrombotic treatment.In the context of a low-flow la state due to reduced mr and mva after mitraclip therapy, optimal antithrombotic treatment and frequent follow-up are essential.The primary and correspondence author is (b)(6).
|
Investigation is not yet complete.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.B3: date of event was estimated to (b)(6) 2024, date of publication.D4: the udi is unknown as the part and lot numbers were not provided d4: lot number was not provided.D6a: implant date was estimated to (b)(6) 2023, 14 months prior to date of publication.A: as this event is from a literature review, the specific patient weight was not provided.The article is attached as article - e-216974.
|
The device was not returned for analysis and a review of the lot history record could not be performed as the lot information was not provided.Based on the information reviewed and due to the limited information available, a cause for the reported thrombus cannot be determined; however, thrombus is listed in the instructions for use (ifu) as a known possible complication associated with mitraclip procedures.Medication required, surgical intervention and hospitalization were a result of case-specific circumstances.There is no indication of a product issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|