• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES SAPIEN TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES SAPIEN TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED Back to Search Results
Model Number 9000TFX26
Device Problems Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913); Unintended Movement (3026)
Patient Problem Calcium Deposits/Calcification (1758)
Event Date 12/12/2013
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported through the implant patient registry (ipr) that two 26mm sapien valves were implanted.No additional information was provided.Additional information provided by the edwards field clinical specialist indicates that during the transapical tavr procedure, upon deployment, the sapien valve ¿jumped¿ aortic and ended up in a 90:10 aortic position.The tee demonstrated the bottom of the valve to be sitting on the annulus: however, a mild pvl was noted.The physicians decided to deploy another sapien valve more ventricular to make sure the first valve was stabilized and to correct the pvl.A second 26 ascendra delivery system was then advanced and the valve was placed 60:40 aortic and remained in this position post deployment.The post deployment tee demonstrated good position and trace pvl.During post operative discussion, the physicians noted that deployment inflation was done too fast and they were not able to correct for the movement of the valve during deployment.Additional information noted there was mild native valve/leaflet calcification.The aortic root calcification and mitral annular calcification (mac) severities are unknown.The image intensifier angle and coaxial alignment of delivery system and valve were reported to be good.Ventilation was held and there was no loss of pacing capture during valve deployment.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Per the instructions for use, device malposition requiring intervention is a known potential adverse event associated with the transcatheter aortic valve replacement (tavr) procedure.There are multiple patient and procedural factors that alone or in combination can cause or contribute to aortic malposition, including improper positioning prior to deployment, poor image intensifier angle, poor coaxial alignment of the valve and delivery system, severe septal hypertrophy, minimally calcified aortic leaflets, preserved ejection fraction, and loss of pacing capture.The thv training manuals instruct the operator on proper positioning and deployment of the valve, including all procedural and anatomical considerations.Physicians are extensively trained by edwards before they are qualified to use the sapien thv.Training includes patient screening, device preparation, approach, deployment, imaging, procedure-specific training manuals and proctored procedures.The correct alignment and positioning of the device at the point of deployment is emphasized as a key factor to the placement and fixation of the device.Operators are also instructed to use fluoroscopy as the primary method of visualization for positioning and deployment.In patients with high-risk anatomical features for aortic malposition (i.E.Minimal leaflet calcification, severe septal hypertrophy), bav may provide indication of potential balloon movement during valve deployment.In this case the exact cause of the event could not be confirmed; however patient (minimal leaflet calcification) and procedural factors (fast inflation) could have caused or contributed to the too aortic deployment of the valve and resulting regurgitation.This event was resolved with implantation of a second valve in a more ventricular position.The ifu and training manuals have been reviewed and no inadequacies have been identified with regards to warnings, contraindications, and the directions/conditions for the successful use of the device.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.No corrective or preventative actions are required.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SAPIEN TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE
Type of Device
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
deborah deutsch
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9497564213
MDR Report Key3567534
MDR Text Key4072757
Report Number2015691-2014-00083
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P110021
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/12/2013
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/11/2015
Device Model Number9000TFX26
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/12/2013
Initial Date FDA Received01/10/2014
Date Device Manufactured09/05/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age85 YR
-
-