Patient specifics with regard to age, gender and weight was not provided by the doctor.Upon the patient's returned visit for a routine checkup, an x-ray was taken.The doctor noticed that there were voids either at the interproximal or at the margin of the tooth.The doctor re-did the restoration for the patient using a different product, without further incident.To date, the patient is doing fine.The product was not returned and no lot number was provided; therefore, no evaluation can be conducted.
|
Although the doctor identified two (2) different shades associated with the voids, the doctor could not verify which lot was used on each patient; therefore, no numbers were identified in this report.The shades involved in the alleged incidents include 34921 and 34922.
|