• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS AUTO-TROL PLUS B LEVEL 1; MULTI-ANALYTE CONTROLS, ALL KINDS (ASSAYED)21

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS AUTO-TROL PLUS B LEVEL 1; MULTI-ANALYTE CONTROLS, ALL KINDS (ASSAYED)21 Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 03321169001
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Laceration(s) (1946)
Event Date 12/23/2013
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
The customer alleged there was an injury during maintenance activities on their b221 analyzer.The customer stated that when removing the glass quality control vials to dispose of them, the first finger on the right hand was injured by the glass vial.The customer was immediately admitted to the aed.The doctor checked the finger and found three small pieces of glass inside the finger.The doctor removed the glass and the wound was dressed.The customer was given a tetanus toxoid vaccine.The customer returned to the laboratory and continued his duties.The customer was wearing a laboratory coat and disposable plastic gloves at the time of the incident.The customer was back to work and in good condition.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This event occurred in (b)(6).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
It was determined the customer did not follow the operator's manual for safely removing the glass ampules from the holding rack during disposal.The injury would not have occurred if procedures had been followed.Product was returned by the customer for investigation.Both the returned product and six retention lots were investigated.Two instances of a glass pick on the side of the ampoule dome head were found and one ampoule had a shard of glass adhering to the side of the ampoule halfway down the bulb.The device history records for the complaint lot as well as lots manufactured in the same month were examined.Incoming inspection records of raw ampules used in the manufacture of the lots were also examined.Equipment log books and preventative maintenance schedules were reviewed for the ampule filling equipment.Training records for ampoule filling technicians were confirmed and interviews were conducted with manufacturing and quality control personnel.The root cause of the glass picks found was attributed to human error as the manufacturing and packaging personnel failed to detect and remove the defective ampoules.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AUTO-TROL PLUS B LEVEL 1
Type of Device
MULTI-ANALYTE CONTROLS, ALL KINDS (ASSAYED)21
Manufacturer (Section D)
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS
9115 hague road
indianapolis IN 46250
Manufacturer (Section G)
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS GMBH
sandhoferstrasse 116
na
mannheim (baden-wurttemberg) 6830 5
GM   68305
Manufacturer Contact
michael leslie
9115 hague road
na
indianapolis, IN 46250
3175214343
MDR Report Key3581262
MDR Text Key4165663
Report Number1823260-2014-00347
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JJY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeHK
PMA/PMN Number
K032453
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/18/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number03321169001
Device Lot Number21430735
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Laboratory
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/30/2013
Initial Date FDA Received01/17/2014
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/18/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-