• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICRUS ENDOVASCULAR, LLC ASCENT - BALLOON CATHETER; CES BALLOON CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICRUS ENDOVASCULAR, LLC ASCENT - BALLOON CATHETER; CES BALLOON CATHETER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number BRS00060900
Device Problem Burst Container or Vessel (1074)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 12/10/2013
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
The complaint received states that during prep the ascent balloon catheter 6 mm x 9 cm (brs00060900 / c14069) ruptured.Even though the operating staff followed ifu exactly, ascent balloon blew during the prep to use.There was no report of injury for the patient.No patient or vessel code information provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The complaint received states that during prep the ascent balloon catheter 6 mm x 9 cm (brs00060900 / c14069) ruptured.Even thought, the operating staff followed ifu exactly, ascent balloon blew during the prep to use.There was no difficulty removing the device from the hoop.The device prepped normally.There is no information regarding contrast media used.Normal contrast ration of 1:1 was used.A syringe device was used to prep and inflate.There was no reported resistance/friction, the event occurred during prep.The balloon inflated normally during prep; however, then burst.No patient or vessel code information provided.There was no report of injury for the patient.A review of the manufacturing documentation associated with this lot presented no issues during the manufacturing or inspection process that can be related to the reported complaint.With the information available and without the product available for analysis the complaint could not be confirmed.Inspections are in place to prevent damaged products from leaving the facility and the dhr review confirmed that the product met specifications.No corrective action is required at this time.It is difficult to draw a clinical conclusion between the device and the event based on the limited information available.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The complaint received states that during prep the ascent balloon catheter 6 mm x 9 cm ((b)(4)) ruptured.Even though, the operating staff followed ifu exactly, ascent balloon blew during the prep to use.There was no difficulty removing the device from the hoop.The device prepped normally.There is no information regarding contrast media used.Normal contrast ration of 1:1 was used.A syringe device was used to prep and inflate.There was no reported resistance/friction, the event occurred during prep.The balloon inflated normally during prep; however, then burst.No patient or vessel code information provided.There was no report of injury for the patient.Conclusion: complaint is not confirmed.Even though the issue described in the event description is balloon burst, no radial or longitudinal tear was found as a result of the visual inspection conducted.The issue identified from this product complaint is: a pinhole in the balloon area.The investigation showed a pinhole in the balloon area as a result of an inflation test executed.Water instead of contrast media was used for the inflation test.As soon as the water reached the balloon area a jet of water was seen.A prior investigation revealed that one of the possible failures when the balloon is over inflated 1 mm above its label diameter is the occurrence of a pinhole leak.(see (b)(4) report part 2).The length between balloon proximal seal and the balloon distal seal for this returned unit is approximately 17 mm.This is an indication that the balloon was over inflated which resulted in stretching the balloon and possibly led to rupture, no additional damage around the pinhole was observed.The root cause of this product complaint appears to be balloon over inflation.All the causes identified are discarded since 100% leak testing is performed on each balloon catheter before it is released to determine whether the balloon leaks, so it is no likely that the balloon left codman neurovascular with this type of failure.No issues related to this product complaint were found in the dhr review executed for this lot# c14069.The reported balloon rupture was not confirmed; however, there was a confirmed pin hole leak on the balloon.100% inspections are in place to prevent damaged products from leaving the facility and the dhr review confirmed that the product met specifications.No corrective action is required at this time.Review of the information suggests that procedural issues may have contributed to the confirmed event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ASCENT - BALLOON CATHETER
Type of Device
CES BALLOON CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICRUS ENDOVASCULAR, LLC
821 fox lane
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer (Section G)
CODMAN AND SHURTLEFF, INC
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer Contact
denise singleton
miami lakes, FL 33014
4084331514
MDR Report Key3590390
MDR Text Key16912072
Report Number1226348-2014-00016
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MJN
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeKS
PMA/PMN Number
K080861
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 12/26/2013
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/11/2014
Device Catalogue NumberBRS00060900
Device Lot NumberC14069
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/19/2014
Initial Date FDA Received01/24/2014
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/03/2014
05/20/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured02/01/2013
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Removal/Correction NumberN/A
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-