• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AV-TEMECULA-CT TREK CORONARY DILATATION CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AV-TEMECULA-CT TREK CORONARY DILATATION CATHETER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 1012274-20
Device Problems Break (1069); Folded (2630)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 12/23/2013
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a heavily calcified right coronary artery (rca).During advancement of a 3.5 x 33 mm xience xpedition stent delivery system (sds), the stent got stuck in the proximal calcified rca.When removing the sds, when only partially into the guiding catheter, the stent implant could not be pulled further into the guiding catheter and also could not be moved forward.The devices were being removed as a single unit; however, at the proximal edge of the sheath, the guide came out, but the stent dislodged and remained in the radial artery.The stent could be seen at the skin surface at the wrist, so a cutdown was made and the stent was pulled out with hemostats.The patient was hemodynamically stable and there was no hematoma on the wrist.The patient returned to the lab on (b)(6) 2013 for a successful femoral percutaneous coronary intervention (pci) of the rca.No additional information was provided.Additional parts were received in the returned goods lab that were used during the procedure.These will be reported for: a 3.0 x 20 mm trek balloon catheter was separated at the proximal seal.A 2.5x 20 mm trek was separated at the guide wire exit notch.A 2.0 x 20 mm mini trek the outer member was wrinkled and torn at the proximal balloon seal.No additional information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.The xience xpedition, trek and mini trek are being filed under separate manufacturing report numbers.Evaluation summary: the device was returned without any complaints of product quality deficiency to confirm.As observed on the return, there was damage to the catheter which was likely due to the use of the catheter to unsuccessfully retrieve the dislodged stent.A review of the lot history record revealed no non-conformances that would have contributed to the observed damage.Review of the similar incidents complaint history of the reported lot did not indicate a manufacturing issue.Based on the visual inspection of the returned device, there is no indication of a product quality deficiency.Based on the information reviewed and return analysis, there is no indication of a product deficiency.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TREK CORONARY DILATATION CATHETER
Type of Device
CORONARY DILATATION CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
AV-TEMECULA-CT
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 462
Manufacturer (Section G)
EL COYOL, COSTA RICA REG# 3009031392
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 462
Manufacturer Contact
connie speck
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key3601029
MDR Text Key4161008
Report Number2024168-2014-00542
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LOX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K103110
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/07/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/30/2015
Device Catalogue Number1012274-20
Device Lot Number30726G1
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/07/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/07/2014
Initial Date FDA Received01/30/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/01/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age78 YR
Patient Weight95
-
-