The ldl-apheresis (ldl-a) with liposorber la-15 system was applied to a (b)(6) years of age female patient (hd), with diabetes mellitus (dm) and dementia, for the treatment of her arterio sclerosis obliterans (aso).In the first ldl-a of the pt, she developed a severe hypotension with a shock symptom at around 10-15 minutes after starting the procedure (at 11:07 am), and the procedure was immediately terminated.The pt fell into a temporary cardiac arrest and an automated external defibrillator (aed) was applied, saline was infused i.V., and her blood pressure (bp) gradually elevated and stayed at 70-80 mmhg (at around 12:00).Her bp recovered to 120 mmhg and she was put on a hd procedure (12:20) and completed the hd without problem (at 15:30).On the same day, her cardio thoracic ratio (ctr) was confirmed normal by an x-ray examination and she went home with no aftereffect of the incident.The pt was administered with an ace-inhibitor (lokopool: lisinopril), and the ldl-a on this day was conducted after one week-cessation of the ace-inhibitor.
|
Anaphylactoid reactions with severe hypotension including shock are known as one of side effects, especially in patients who are concomitantly treated with ace-inhibitors, which are attributed to the dextran sulfate-cellulose gels or the ingredient of the "liposorber la-15 ldl adsorption columns".In (b)(6), patients being treated with any ace-inhibitor is contraindicated to the ldl-apheresis (ldl-a) with this device.In our investigation, the patient (pt) was prescribed with an ace-inhibitor, "lokopool", and the pt was applied to the ldl-a with this device after one week-cessation of the ace-inhibitor.The pt is on chronic hemodialysis (hd) with renal failure, and the effectiveness of the ace-inhibitor had remained longer than usual, and one week-cessation seemed insufficient to eliminate the influence of the ace-inhibitor.Her second ldl-a with this device was successfully done two weeks after this event with continuous cessation of the ace-inhibitor by using nafamostat mesilate, "futhan", as an anticoagulant.Accordingly, we believe that the event was caused by a use error to use the device against contra-indication and not be any defect or malfunction of the device.The actual device used was not available for our further investigation.
|