• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK ROTALINK? PLUS; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK ROTALINK? PLUS; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY Back to Search Results
Model Number H749236310020
Device Problems Thermal Decomposition of Device (1071); Overheating of Device (1437)
Patient Problem No Patient Involvement (2645)
Event Date 01/14/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Same case as: 2134265-2014-00641.It was reported that the burr overheated.The target lesion was located in the coronary artery.A 1.25mm rotablator rotalink plus was selected to treat the target lesion.During platform testing outside the patient, it was reported that the burr overheated which burned the "protective hub".The procedure was completed with a 1.5mm rotalink device.No patient complications were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Device evaluated by mfr: the device has not been received for analysis.Upon receipt and completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluated by manufacturer.The device was returned for analysis.Microscopic examination of the returned device revealed that the burr was detached and not returned with the device.The testing of the device outside of the patient sees the burr rotating at high speeds.It is likely the burr was detached as a result of this, as the coil was found to be stretched.It is probable that during the testing of the rotablator plus unit, the rotating burr came in contact with the guidewire causing the burr to become stuck on the guidewire and detach.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The most probable root cause is considered handling damage as the event occurred without direct patient contact.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Same case as: 2134265-2014-00641.It was reported that the burr overheated.The target lesion was located in the coronary artery.A 1.25mm rotablator rotalink plus was selected to treat the target lesion.During platform testing outside the patient, it was reported that the burr overheated which burned the "protective hub".The procedure was completed with a 1.5mm rotalink device.No patient complications were reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ROTALINK? PLUS
Type of Device
CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK
business and technology park
model farm road
cork
EI 
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK
business and technology park
model farm road
cork
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
ingrid matte
one scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634941700
MDR Report Key3624564
MDR Text Key4209355
Report Number2134265-2014-00642
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFR
PMA/PMN Number
P900056
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/14/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/31/2015
Device Model NumberH749236310020
Device Catalogue Number23631-002
Device Lot Number0016401601
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/13/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/19/2014
Initial Date FDA Received02/12/2014
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/14/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/30/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-