The patient underwent a zero-p removal revision surgery due to a possible non-union and a screw backing out.This was indicated by films taken.The original implant surgery was performed by a different surgeon on an unknown date.The revision surgeon removed a third party plate from the c4 to c7 segment and removed the zero-p device at level c3 and 4.The surgeon repeated the same fusion, re-plating, and allograft at the c3 and 4 level with a vectra plate as well as a posterior spinous process fusion of c3 and 4 using onlay graft and cable supplementation.There was no reported harm to the patient.The procedure was successfully completed.The zero-p implant was discarded, no part or lot numbers were documented.The revision was at c3 and 4 only.The zero-p was removed at c3 and 4 and the void replaced with bone graft and plated with vectra.The surgeon removed the third party manufactured plate at c4 to c7 prior to the removal of the zero-p implant.The segment from c4 to c7 had successfully fused.This report is for unknown spine part, the zero p implant involved in the non-union.This report is 2 of 3 for complaint (b)(4).
|