The reported complaint was not confirmed.A technical evaluation conducted at the (b)(4) service center on 21 may 2014 did not find any defect that could have contributed to the reported failure to alarm issue.The pump was found with cosmetic damages (broken top case), however, the pump passed all functional tests and found working within specification (refer to ra#208420-005).The root cause for the reported issue is deemed undetermined.Per information provided, the cited patient is very mobile, hoists himself in and out of bed/chair and drives a car.Based on this facts, loss of dressing adhesion could be attributed to a combination of factors such as wound location, patient mobility, constant friction and pressure directly applied to wound site.In regards to a pump not triggering a leak alarm, it can be hypothesized that a partial blockage led to the observed issue.It is very likely the pump did not alarm because the system was still reaching vacuum in presence of partial blockage (potentially caused by clotting or buildup of blood clots/exudate inside the wound filler (foam/gauze).The system is designed to assert a leak alarm when the fluid has cleared the tubing set and air has been freely flowing through the tubing in a rate greater than 3.5l/min for more1(one) minute.Presence of partial blockage is supported by the fact that once dressing technique was changed to gauze with drain dressing stayed in place for much longer and pump alarmed when seal broke.Per the information provided no patient injuries or harm occurred in association with this issue.The complaint is recorded and any similar issues will be monitored through the complaint system.
|