• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TERUMO CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS CORP. TERUMO CENTRIFUGAL SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TERUMO CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS CORP. TERUMO CENTRIFUGAL SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number 164267
Device Problems Filling Problem (1233); Device Inoperable (1663); Device Displays Incorrect Message (2591)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 12/16/2013
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that during use of the device for a cardiopulmonary bypass (cpb) procedure, the centrifugal drive motor stopped several times.The device was not changed out, as the perfusionist (ccp) hand cranked the drive motor.There was a delay of about three minutes as the troubleshooting and hand cranking was being performed.The surgical procedure was completed successfully, and there were no blood loss or no adverse consequences to the patient.Per the clinical review on (b)(6) 2013: set-up and priming was without issue.About ninety minutes into cpb, when the patient was at thirty degrees celsius, the ccp noticed the venous reservoir was filling with blood and then she heard a back flow alarm.The ccp observed the centrifugal control module was in the stop mode.She re-started the motor via the start / stop switch on the control module but was not able to increase the pump revolutions per minute (rpms).The ccp attempted to generate a pump speed and was not able to get the rpm above 300rpm and the motor would again stop.Hand cranking was started about thirty seconds later and continued about a minute.Again the motor was able to be started, but would keep going into the stop mode.Hand cranking again was performed to support the circulation of the patient.About three minutes after the motor initially stopped, the pump again was placed in the start mode and the perfusionist (ccp) was finally able to generate a pump speed of greater than 2000rpm and was able to adequately provide arterial flow for the patient.The remainder of cpb was without issue.The total time of loss of motor function was about three minutes.The ccp mentioned that she had heard after the case, that power surges were experienced in the operating room area during the procedure.She stated there were no alarms, alerts, or errors to indicate an issue with power within system-1.The ccp stated, the only alarms that occurred during this incident were back flow alarms.The procedure was completed successfully without associated blood loss.The patient was weaned from cpb after the procedure, without issue.There was no patient harm reported or observed.The ccp estimated the surgical procedure was delayed by about three minutes as the troubleshooting and hand cranking was being performed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TERUMO CENTRIFUGAL SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
TERUMO CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS CORP.
ann arbor MI 48103
Manufacturer Contact
jan winder
6200 jackson rd.
ann arbor, MI 48103
7346634145
MDR Report Key3647642
MDR Text Key4183065
Report Number1828100-2013-01166
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DWA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K950739
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/17/2013
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number164267
Device Catalogue Number164267
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/17/2013
Initial Date FDA Received01/09/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured05/01/2010
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age81 YR
-
-