• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ENDOLOGIX, INC. AFX SYSTEM; SUPRARENAL PROXIMAL EXTENSION STENT GRAFT (SCS)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ENDOLOGIX, INC. AFX SYSTEM; SUPRARENAL PROXIMAL EXTENSION STENT GRAFT (SCS) Back to Search Results
Model Number A28-28/C75-O20 V
Device Problem Sticking (1597)
Patient Problems Calcium Deposits/Calcification (1758); Excessive Tear Production (2235)
Event Date 03/17/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that during implantation of a bifurcated device and a suprarenal aortic extension, tearing of the left iliac artery occurred.Reportedly, the patient's left iliac artery was severely calcified, and during aortic extension delivery system retraction, resistance was felt.Angiography revealed the system became stuck in the left iliac, due to the hard calcium in the vessel.The physician manipulated the delivery system without success, and ultimately applied additional force, which released the delivery system from the vessel.Repeat angiography revealed a tear in left iliac artery, and upon inspection of the delivery system, it was observed that approximately a 2 inch segment of the vessel and a pea size of hard calcium, came out with the sheath.The physician performed a fem-by-fem bypass to repair the artery with good result.The patient was reported to be recovering and in stable condition.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Endologix continues to investigate the reported event.Endologix will submit a supplemental report in accordance with 21 cfr 803.56 when additional information becomes available.Device remains implanted in patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device remains implanted in the patient and is therefore, not available for analysis.Still images were provided and reviewed by internal medical director.The review indicates the reported event is confirmed.The cause was determined to be related to the extreme calcification of the vessels and associated angulation.No device issue was identified.A manufacturing record review was performed, the lot met all release criteria with no issues or deviations that would explain the reported event.The lot usage history showed no other units have been involved in any similar event.The product labeling was reviewed and confirmed that the reported event is adequately captured in the existing labeling.Corrected data: contact office.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AFX SYSTEM
Type of Device
SUPRARENAL PROXIMAL EXTENSION STENT GRAFT (SCS)
Manufacturer (Section D)
ENDOLOGIX, INC.
11 studebaker
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
ENDOLOGIX, INC.
11 studebaker
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
gail hapner
11 studebaker
irvine, CA 92618
9495984611
MDR Report Key3698464
MDR Text Key4262124
Report Number2031527-2014-00095
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MIH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P040002
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/17/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date01/03/2015
Device Model NumberA28-28/C75-O20 V
Device Catalogue Number1203991-006
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/14/2014
Initial Date FDA Received03/25/2014
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/15/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured02/19/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age78 YR
-
-