BIOSENSE WEBSTER, LTD (HAIFA, ISRAEL) CARTO® 3 SYSTEM; COMPUTER, DIAGNOSTIC, PROGRAMMABLE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number M-4800-01 |
Device Problems
Pacing Problem (1439); Failure to Read Input Signal (1581)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 03/06/2014 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
During a procedure, it was reported the user lost all the bs and ic ecg signals when come on pacing with the his 4 pole catheter connected to the 20 pole a port.The issue was resolved by switching to the 20 pole b port.Additional information received stated the signal loss occurred on all the channels, including the 12 leads of bs ecgs and all ic (intracardial) recordings.The signal loss occurred on both carto and ep recording systems at the same time.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).During a procedure it was reported the user lost all the bs and ic ecg signals when come on pacing with the his 4 pole catheter connected to the 20 pole a port.The issue was resolved by switching to the 20 pole b port.Additional information received stated the signal loss occurred on all the channels, including the 12 leads of bs ecgs and all ic (intracardial) recordings.The signal loss occurred on both carto and ep recording systems at the same time.The field service engineer (fse) went onsite but could not verify the issue.After speaking with second fse it was decided to replace ecg card 2.Card was replaced and system was tested.System is functioning correctly and ready for use.The suspicious ecg card was sent to device manufacturer (htc).Htc rma reported: the customer complaint was not confirmed.This card passed tests at aquarium station, service jig station (ecg tests), tester level ii (ecg and ep out tests), megger test with success.Reported problem was not reproduced.The dhr associated with carto 3 # (b)(4) was reviewed and there were not any discrepancies noted related to the reported issue.The system met all specifications upon its release.An additional oem manufacturer action (dhr review) was performed.No anomalies were noted in manufacturing or service.The customer complaint was not confirmed.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|