• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO ACTIVA; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTED, FOR PARKINSONIAN TREMOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO ACTIVA; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTED, FOR PARKINSONIAN TREMOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 37612
Device Problems Electromagnetic Interference (1194); Therapy Delivered to Incorrect Body Area (1508); Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation (1574); Device Displays Incorrect Message (2591); Battery Problem (2885); Charging Problem (2892); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problems Undesired Nerve Stimulation (1980); Tingling (2171); Therapeutic Response, Decreased (2271); Complaint, Ill-Defined (2331); Electric Shock (2554)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that the patient had increased stimulation and ¿side effects¿ after going through a theft detector at a drug store.The following day, it was reported that the patient didn¿t have any problem with therapy until (b)(6) 2013, when the patient went through the theft detector.The patient started to feel shocks in his left arm and had blurred vision the day after.Additionally, the battery was checked with the patient programmer which showed a call-your-doctor icon.After recharging the battery to 100%, the shocks ceased.The following morning, the battery had completely run down.It was recharged again and reset by the healthcare provider (hcp) but the shocks continued.Since then, ¿satisfactory results in the treatment was no longer obtained¿.On (b)(6) 2014, after several attempts, it was possible to set the device to obtain the therapeutic results prior to the theft detector incident.Five days after that however, a call-your-doctor icon was displayed again.The patient also started to feel shocks in his left arm and the battery started to run down quickly.The device was reprogrammed twice after that but that did not ultimately remedy the situation.Stimulation was subsequently turned off.The reporter believed that ¿the device was not supporting amplitude pulses greater than 3v since there was discharge and the need to turn the device off and reduce the amplitude¿.Four days later, it was reported that the patient was charging more than expected.The message that accompanied the call-your-doctor icon could not be recalled.It was further reported that the patient also started feeling tingling in his arm after going through the theft detector.It was unknown if it was a power-on-reset (por) that was displayed along with the call-your-doctor icon.The device reportedly discharged within a day and the patient believed there was a ¿failure¿ with it.Diagnostic testing performed on (b)(6) 2014 showed the typical recharge duration was 0.5 hours and the typical recharge interval was 0 days and the implantable neurostimulator (ins) status was ok.Similar testing done approximately a week later indicated that the typical recharge duration was 0.4 hours and the typical recharge interval was 0.2 days.It was also noted that stimulation was off.Cycling had been off in both cases and the patient had been programmed to 0+,1+,2-,3+ and 8+,9-,10-,11+ on the left and right globus pallidus (gpi) respectively.No information on coupling was provided for both tests.There were no out-of-range impedances found.The charge percentage at the end of recharge sessions varied, but were not always 100%.Approximately two weeks later, it was reported that a ¿malfunction¿ was observed but the cause of the issue was not determined.Telemetry was performed and information pertaining to that diagnostic testing was pending.Surgery was going to be performed, details related to this of which were unknown at the time.The patient was not receiving effective therapy.If additional information becomes available, a follow-up report will be submitted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Correction: additional review indicated that the "side effects" felt by the patient included a "weird feeling" in their right hand.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ACTIVA
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTED, FOR PARKINSONIAN TREMOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO
ceiba norte industrial park, r
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis MN 55432
Manufacturer Contact
diane wolf
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263987
MDR Report Key3702814
MDR Text Key4336952
Report Number3004209178-2014-05131
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MRU
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
H020007
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Consumer,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/24/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/28/2012
Device Model Number37612
Device Catalogue Number37612
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/21/2014
Initial Date FDA Received03/27/2014
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/21/2014
Date Device Manufactured12/12/2011
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-