• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: Q-MED AB DEFLUX; AGENT, BULKING, INJECTABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

Q-MED AB DEFLUX; AGENT, BULKING, INJECTABLE Back to Search Results
Device Problem Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535)
Patient Problems Granuloma (1876); Failure of Implant (1924); Inflammation (1932); Urinary Tract Infection (2120); Regurgitation (2259)
Event Date 01/01/2005
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
A physician reported via a literature article that a (b)(6) old female received deflux (dextranomer microspheres/hyaluronic acid) injection into the submucosa of the urinary bladder as treatment for left-sided grade 3 vesicoureteral reflux (vur).Additional medical history included recurrent urinary tract infections.Concurrent medications were not provided.In 2005, the patient received deflux into the vesical ostium of the left ureter.Following the procedure, the patient experienced persistent urinary tract infection.Three years after deflux implantation, a miction cystography revealed the presence of left-sided fifth-degree vur.On unknown date, the patient underwent re-implantation of the ureter.After opening the bladder, a hard inflammatory infiltrate in the area of the vesical ostium was found.Histopathology of the 2 centimeter ureteral segment revealed a significantly exfoliated transitional epithelium with a visible chronic inflammatory infiltrate beneath.Outside the muscular coat, a focus 2-millimeters in diameter was visible.It was formed by droplets of iatrogenic origin and surrounded by polynucleic histiocytes.Following surgery, the urinary tract infections resolved.Six months later, a miction cystography were performed and did not show any features of reflux.The authors felt that the events were related to deflux.The company felt the events were related to deflux.Source of report (literature): 1, marcin zyczkowski, central european journal of urology, 2012, 65, from 230 to 231, complications following endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteric reflux with deflux-two case studies.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DEFLUX
Type of Device
AGENT, BULKING, INJECTABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
Q-MED AB
uppsala
SW 
Manufacturer (Section G)
Q-MED AB
seminariegatan 21
uppsala SE-7 52 2
SW   SE-752 28
Manufacturer Contact
8510 colonnade center dr
raleigh, NC 27615
9198621000
MDR Report Key3708613
MDR Text Key16058809
Report Number3009325614-2014-00010
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LNM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodePL
PMA/PMN Number
P000029
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Distributor
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/19/2014,03/04/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA03/19/2014
Distributor Facility Aware Date03/04/2014
Date Report to Manufacturer03/14/2014
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received03/19/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age3 YR
-
-