Model Number 302-20 |
Device Problems
High impedance (1291); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017)
|
Patient Problems
Bruise/Contusion (1754); Fall (1848); Seizures (2063)
|
Event Date 03/10/2014 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the vns patient¿s device was tested and diagnostic results revealed high lead impedance (impedance value >= 10,000 ohms) during an office visit on (b)(6) 2014.The patient stated that she had a seizure and fell.The patient¿s arm was bruised but she is unsure if the fall caused or contributed to the reported high impedance.Additional information was received stating that the patient underwent generator and lead replacement surgery due to high impedance on (b)(6) 2014.The explanted products have not been returned to manufacturer to date.
|
|
Event Description
|
The explanted generator and lead were returned for analysis.Analysis of the lead was completed on (b)(4) 2014.Scanning electron microscopy images of the positive coil show that pitting or electro¿etching conditions have occurred at the end of the positive coil.Due to metal dissolution the fracture mechanism of the coil cannot be determined.Scanning electron microscopy images of the negative coil show that a stress-induced fracture (due to rotational forces) has occurred on the negative coil.Also, the early stages of secondary fractures noted in the vicinity of the broken strands appear to indicate the stress-related primary fractures were most likely created during the explant procedure.Note that since the electrode array portion was not returned for analysis, an evaluation and resulting commentary cannot be made on that portion of the lead.Other than the above mentioned observations and typical wear and explant related observations, no other anomalies were identified in the returned lead portion.Analysis of the generator was completed on (b)(4) 2014.A comprehensive automated electrical evaluation showed that the pulse generator performed according to functional specifications.There were no performance or any other type of adverse conditions found with the pulse generator.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device manufacturing records were reviewed.Review of manufacturing records confirmed that the lead passed all functional tests prior to distribution.Device failure is suspected, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device failure occurred, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|