• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. LEAD MODEL 302

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. LEAD MODEL 302 Back to Search Results
Model Number 302-20
Device Problems High impedance (1291); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017)
Patient Problems Bruise/Contusion (1754); Fall (1848); Seizures (2063)
Event Date 03/10/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that the vns patient¿s device was tested and diagnostic results revealed high lead impedance (impedance value >= 10,000 ohms) during an office visit on (b)(6) 2014.The patient stated that she had a seizure and fell.The patient¿s arm was bruised but she is unsure if the fall caused or contributed to the reported high impedance.Additional information was received stating that the patient underwent generator and lead replacement surgery due to high impedance on (b)(6) 2014.The explanted products have not been returned to manufacturer to date.
 
Event Description
The explanted generator and lead were returned for analysis.Analysis of the lead was completed on (b)(4) 2014.Scanning electron microscopy images of the positive coil show that pitting or electro¿etching conditions have occurred at the end of the positive coil.Due to metal dissolution the fracture mechanism of the coil cannot be determined.Scanning electron microscopy images of the negative coil show that a stress-induced fracture (due to rotational forces) has occurred on the negative coil.Also, the early stages of secondary fractures noted in the vicinity of the broken strands appear to indicate the stress-related primary fractures were most likely created during the explant procedure.Note that since the electrode array portion was not returned for analysis, an evaluation and resulting commentary cannot be made on that portion of the lead.Other than the above mentioned observations and typical wear and explant related observations, no other anomalies were identified in the returned lead portion.Analysis of the generator was completed on (b)(4) 2014.A comprehensive automated electrical evaluation showed that the pulse generator performed according to functional specifications.There were no performance or any other type of adverse conditions found with the pulse generator.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device manufacturing records were reviewed.Review of manufacturing records confirmed that the lead passed all functional tests prior to distribution.Device failure is suspected, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device failure occurred, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LEAD MODEL 302
Type of Device
LEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058 770
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key3723807
MDR Text Key4306657
Report Number1644487-2014-00870
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/10/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date06/30/2006
Device Model Number302-20
Device Lot Number010763
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/03/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/03/2014
Initial Date FDA Received04/03/2014
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/01/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/22/2004
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age43 YR
-
-