• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PX SLIM DELIVERY MICROCATHETER; DQY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PX SLIM DELIVERY MICROCATHETER; DQY Back to Search Results
Catalog Number PXSLIMSTR
Device Problems Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Premature Activation (1484); Difficult to Remove (1528); Physical Resistance (2578); Difficult to Advance (2920)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 12/18/2013
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a procedure to treat a type 3 endoleak with a ruby coil system.During the procedure, the physician was able to deploy two ruby coils through the pxslim delivery microcatheter with no issues; however, on the third coil the physician felt significant resistance.The physician attempted several times to reposition the coil and microcatheter to attempt to deliver the coil; however, was unsuccessful.The physician then decided to remove the entire coil system and upon removal, the physician noted that the coil had detached inside the microcatheter.The physician then attempted to remove the microcatheter with the detached coil inside and unfortunately during the withdrawal, the coil migrated into the 5f diagnostic catheter.The physician then removed the diagnostic catheter to attempt to retrieve the coil; however only a portion of the coil was still in the diagnostic catheter and the rest of the coil lodged in the groin sheath.The physician then manually removed the coil by hand until all of the platinum strands were completely removed from the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Result: the pxslim microcatheter is kinked approximately 4.5 cm from the distal tip.Conclusion\: the device was returned for analysis and has been evaluated.The complaint indicates that after two coils were successfully deployed with no issue.On the third coil significant resistance was encountered.Evaluation of the returned product revealed that the pxslim catheter was kinked approximately 4.5 cm from the distal tip.This kink is likely the reason significant resistance was encountered while attempting to deploy the third coil.During retrieval, the coil was unintentionally detached due to excess tensile force placed on the device when pulling back, causing the sr wire to break, detaching the coil in the microcatheter.The cause of the kink in the microcatheter is unknown but was not present when the first two coils were deployed.Therefore, the kink must have occurred during manipulation of the device in patient anatomy.This mdr is associated with mdr 3005168196-2014-00054.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PX SLIM DELIVERY MICROCATHETER
Type of Device
DQY
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
1351 harbor bay parkway
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer (Section G)
PENUMBRA, INC.
1351 harbor bay parkway
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
kathleen kidd
1351 harbor bay parkway
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key3734795
MDR Text Key15115614
Report Number3005168196-2014-00232
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DQY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K100826
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Radiologic Technologist
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 02/06/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Catalogue NumberPXSLIMSTR
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/03/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/06/2014
Initial Date FDA Received04/08/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-