• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. LEAD MODEL 302

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. LEAD MODEL 302 Back to Search Results
Model Number 302-20
Device Problems Break (1069); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017)
Patient Problem Injury (2348)
Event Date 03/21/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
An implant card was received indicating that the vns patient underwent lead and generator replacement surgery on (b)(6) 2014 due to lead discontinuity.Patient trauma is believed to have caused or contributed to the high impedance.X-rays were taken to verify lead pin insertion but were not provided for review.Review of the available programming and diagnostic history showed normal diagnostic results through (b)(6) 2011.The explanted generator and lead have been returned to the manufacturer where analysis is currently underway.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Review of the available programming and diagnostic history.Device failure is suspected, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
 
Event Description
During the product analysis there were no anomalies found with the pulse generator.The generator performed according to functional specifications.During the visual analysis of the returned 215mm portion of the lead the (-) connector pin quadfilar coil appeared to be broken approximately 161mm from the end of the connector boot.Scanning electron microscopy was performed and identified the area as being mechanically damaged with pitting which prevented identification of the coil fracture type.During the visual analysis of the returned 197mm portion the (-) connector pin quadfilar coil appeared to be broken approximately 3mm from the end of the abraded open / torn / outer / inner silicone tubes.Scanning electron microscopy was performed and identified the area as being mechanically damaged with pitting which prevented identification of the coil fracture type.The area on one of the broken coil strands had evidence of a stress induced fracture (torsional appearance) which most likely completed the fracture.Pitting was observed on the connector pin coil surface.It is believed that stimulation was present for a certain period of time as evidenced by the presence of metal pitting.The abraded opening and slice mark found on the outer silicone tubing, most likely provided the leakage path for the dried remnants of what appeared to have once been body fluids inside the outer silicone tubing.The abraded openings found on the inner silicone tubes, most likely provided the leakage path for the dried remnants of what appeared to have once been body fluids inside the inner silicone tubes.During the visual analysis of the returned 27mm portion the (+) white electrode and ribbon appeared to be partially embedded in what appeared to be dried body tissue.This condition may have prevented the (+) white electrode ribbon from coming in contact with the vagus nerve.With the exception of the observed discontinuities and the partially tissue-covered (+) white electrode and ribbon the condition of the returned lead portion is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure.No other obvious anomalies were noted.The setscrew marks found on the lead connector pin provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present.Continuity checks of the returned lead portions were performed, during the visual analysis, with no other discontinuities identified.Based on the findings, there is evidence to suggest a discontinuity in the returned portions of the device which may have contributed to the reported event.Note that since one of the inner silicone tubes and quadfilar coils between the electrode bifurcation and anchor tether was not returned for analysis, an evaluation cannot be made on that portion of the lead.However, the positive electrode condition may have contributed to the reported event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device failure occurred, but did not cause or contribute to death or serious injury.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LEAD MODEL 302
Type of Device
LEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058 770
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key3753816
MDR Text Key4466923
Report Number1644487-2014-01019
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFR
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/21/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date12/31/2010
Device Model Number302-20
Device Lot Number200679
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/14/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/06/2014
Initial Date FDA Received04/16/2014
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/30/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/12/2007
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age16 YR
-
-