• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION COREVALVE 26MM AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION COREVALVE 26MM AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED Back to Search Results
Model Number MCS-P3-26-AOA
Device Problem Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problems Congestive Heart Failure (1783); Regurgitation (2259)
Event Date 02/19/2012
Event Type  Death  
Manufacturer Narrative
Subsequently the clinical study site reported that the patient death was probably related to the device replacement procedure, and that valve replacement was performed due to a thrombus on the device¿s left coronary cusp.A supplemental report will be filed when the analysis/investigation is completed.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information that approximately eleven months after the implant of this transcatheter bioprosthetic heart valve the patient exhibited acute chest pain, and moderate aortic regurgitation (ar) was observed via cardiac catheterization.A transesophageal echocardiogram (tee) 16 days later also documented moderate ar.An x-ray showed no acute pathology and an electrocardiogram (ecg) showed no changes.The chest pain was treated medically.There was no treatment or intervention for the ar, which was reported as continuing, and the device remained implanted.Approximately two months after the onset of the chest pain and ar, the patient presented with increasing congestive heart failure symptoms and was found to have significant prosthetic aortic insufficiency.This device was subsequently surgically explanted and another manufacturer¿s prosthetic valve was implanted.It was reported that the patient subsequently passed away five days after the reoperation due to right-sided heart failure (severe hypokinesis).Left ventricular function was normal, as observed via tee.The patient was initially treated intravenously with medications for the depressed rv function prior to the patient¿s family electing for the administration of only palliative care after there were no signs of hemodynamic improvement.No autopsy was performed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The product has been returned and analysis is in progress.Upon completion of analysis and investigation, a supplemental report will be submitted.(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: upon receipt at medtronic's quality laboratory, the valve appears slightly distorted; oval shaped.All leaflets were stiff due to host tissue on the outflow.All leaflets appear intact.All commissures appear intact however host tissue overgrowth made it difficult to determine the exact condition.Glistening off white pannus lines the inflow, extending into and covering the inner lumen to the inflow margin of attachment and all inferior coaptive areas.Pannus remained attached to the outflow frame, along the outflow margin of attachment, to the tops of all commissures, extending partially along the free margins, showing possible restricted leaflet movement.Brown thrombotic appearing host tissue filled and stiffened all leaflets on the outflow.Radiography showed no stent fractures but a tiny remnant of mineralization along the outside of the skirt.Conclusion: post-implant occurrence of aortic regurgitation after an extended time period can be caused by a variety of factors, including changes to patient anatomy or pre-existing medical conditions, and the root cause could not be determined from the information provided.A number of factors can affect the creation of thrombus, including medications, peri-procedural injury, and pre-existing patient conditions, and its presence and rate of formation is largely dependent on patient condition.Both aortic regurgitation and thrombus are listed as known potential adverse effect in the ifu.Although a conclusive cause of the pannus and thrombus could not be determined, these are known failure modes for bioprosthetic heart valves, and are most likely a patient related condition.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
COREVALVE 26MM AORTIC VALVE
Type of Device
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e. deere ave.
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC STRUCTURAL HEART
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view MN 55112
Manufacturer Contact
mike gaffney
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635265629
MDR Report Key3759335
MDR Text Key11751414
Report Number2025587-2014-00221
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P130021
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Study,Health Professional,health professional,stu
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 04/28/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/24/2013
Device Model NumberMCS-P3-26-AOA
Device Catalogue NumberMCS-P3-26-AOA
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/27/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/28/2014
Initial Date FDA Received04/18/2014
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
04/28/2014
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/28/2014
05/21/2014
09/14/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured11/14/2012
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Death; Required Intervention;
Patient Age00065 YR
-
-