• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY WALLFLEX? ESOPHAGEAL; PROSTHESIS, ESOPHAGEAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY WALLFLEX? ESOPHAGEAL; PROSTHESIS, ESOPHAGEAL Back to Search Results
Model Number M00516730
Device Problems Break (1069); Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Material Integrity Problem (2978)
Patient Problems Dysphagia/ Odynophagia (1815); Stenosis (2263)
Event Date 01/31/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a wallflex esophageal fully covered stent was implanted during an esophageal dilatation and stent implantation procedure performed on (b)(6), 2013.According to the complainant, the stent was placed to treat a non-malignant esophageal stenosis 0-5cm above the esophago-gastric junction.Reportedly, the patient¿s anatomy was not tortuous and had not been dilated prior to the procedure.On (b)(6), 2014, the patient experienced dysphagia due to recurrent stenosis in the esophagus.The physician noted that the stent had migrated into the stomach.The stent was removed from the patient.The physician performed a dilation of the stenosis to complete the procedure.The patient condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported stable.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).A visual examination of the returned device noted that only a deployed stent was returned for analysis.The stent wires at the flared end were broken and the stent cover was torn.A hole greater than 1.0mm in diameter was noted at the non-flared end.The complainant reported that this device was used to treat a nonmalignant esophageal stenosis.The wallflex esophageal fully covered stent system dfu states that it is contraindicated for placement in esophageal strictures by benign tumors.Therefore, the most probable root cause classification is user/use error.A review of the device history record (dhr) was performed; no anomalies were noted.A search of the complaint database revealed that no similar complaints exist for the specified lot.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Returned for analysis was a deployed stent only.The stent wires at the flared end were broken and the stent cover was torn also.A hole was noted at the nonflared end that was greater than 1.0mm in diameter.No other issues noted.The investigation concluded that the complaint is due to a known physiological effect of the procedure noted within the directions for use, and/or device labeling.  therefore, the most probable root cause classification for the reported failure is anticipated procedural complication.A review of the device history record (dhr) was performed; no anomalies were noted.A search of the complaint database revealed that no similar complaints exist for the specified lot.Labeling review indicates that there was evidence that the device was used in a manner inconsistent with the labelled indications.The wallflex esophageal fully covered stent system is contraindicated for placement in esophageal strictures caused by benign tumors, as the long-term effects of the stent in the esophagus are unknown.This stent was used to treat a nonmalignant esophageal stenosis.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a wallflex esophageal fully covered stent was implanted during an esophageal dilatation and stent implantation procedure performed on (b)(6) 2013.According to the complainant, the stent was placed to treat a non-malignant esophageal stenosis 0-5cm above the esophago-gastric junction.Reportedly, the patient's anatomy was not tortuous and had not been dilated prior to the procedure.On (b)(6) 2014, the patient experienced dysphagia due to recurrent stenosis in the esophagus.The physician noted that the stent had migrated into the stomach.The stent was removed from the patient.The physician performed a dilation of the stenosis to complete the procedure.The patient condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported stable.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
WALLFLEX? ESOPHAGEAL
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, ESOPHAGEAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY
ballybrit business park
galway
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY
ballybrit business park
galway
Manufacturer Contact
ingrid matte
100 boston scientific way
marlborough, MA 01752
5086834000
MDR Report Key3769746
MDR Text Key4430954
Report Number3005099803-2014-01719
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code ESW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodePL
PMA/PMN Number
K091510
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/17/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/21/2015
Device Model NumberM00516730
Device Catalogue Number1673
Device Lot Number0016398141
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/18/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/09/2014
Initial Date FDA Received04/24/2014
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/22/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/26/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age65 YR
-
-