Model Number M00516730 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Material Integrity Problem (2978)
|
Patient Problems
Dysphagia/ Odynophagia (1815); Stenosis (2263)
|
Event Date 01/31/2014 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a wallflex esophageal fully covered stent was implanted during an esophageal dilatation and stent implantation procedure performed on (b)(6), 2013.According to the complainant, the stent was placed to treat a non-malignant esophageal stenosis 0-5cm above the esophago-gastric junction.Reportedly, the patient¿s anatomy was not tortuous and had not been dilated prior to the procedure.On (b)(6), 2014, the patient experienced dysphagia due to recurrent stenosis in the esophagus.The physician noted that the stent had migrated into the stomach.The stent was removed from the patient.The physician performed a dilation of the stenosis to complete the procedure.The patient condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported stable.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).A visual examination of the returned device noted that only a deployed stent was returned for analysis.The stent wires at the flared end were broken and the stent cover was torn.A hole greater than 1.0mm in diameter was noted at the non-flared end.The complainant reported that this device was used to treat a nonmalignant esophageal stenosis.The wallflex esophageal fully covered stent system dfu states that it is contraindicated for placement in esophageal strictures by benign tumors.Therefore, the most probable root cause classification is user/use error.A review of the device history record (dhr) was performed; no anomalies were noted.A search of the complaint database revealed that no similar complaints exist for the specified lot.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Returned for analysis was a deployed stent only.The stent wires at the flared end were broken and the stent cover was torn also.A hole was noted at the nonflared end that was greater than 1.0mm in diameter.No other issues noted.The investigation concluded that the complaint is due to a known physiological effect of the procedure noted within the directions for use, and/or device labeling. therefore, the most probable root cause classification for the reported failure is anticipated procedural complication.A review of the device history record (dhr) was performed; no anomalies were noted.A search of the complaint database revealed that no similar complaints exist for the specified lot.Labeling review indicates that there was evidence that the device was used in a manner inconsistent with the labelled indications.The wallflex esophageal fully covered stent system is contraindicated for placement in esophageal strictures caused by benign tumors, as the long-term effects of the stent in the esophagus are unknown.This stent was used to treat a nonmalignant esophageal stenosis.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a wallflex esophageal fully covered stent was implanted during an esophageal dilatation and stent implantation procedure performed on (b)(6) 2013.According to the complainant, the stent was placed to treat a non-malignant esophageal stenosis 0-5cm above the esophago-gastric junction.Reportedly, the patient's anatomy was not tortuous and had not been dilated prior to the procedure.On (b)(6) 2014, the patient experienced dysphagia due to recurrent stenosis in the esophagus.The physician noted that the stent had migrated into the stomach.The stent was removed from the patient.The physician performed a dilation of the stenosis to complete the procedure.The patient condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported stable.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|