• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER ENDOSCOPY-SAN JOSE PNEUMO SURE INCL. MANUAL: EN; INSUFFLATOR, LAPAROSCOPIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER ENDOSCOPY-SAN JOSE PNEUMO SURE INCL. MANUAL: EN; INSUFFLATOR, LAPAROSCOPIC Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 620040601SSP
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems High Blood Pressure/ Hypertension (1908); Tachycardia (2095)
Event Date 10/28/2013
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that the anaesthetist experienced problems during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Within the first two minutes, tachycardia and a fall in blood pressure was observed with low output.It was further reported that a severe hypotension out of proportion compared with the usual hypotension due to pneumoperitoneum.The company representative assumed that the patient was tied.Once the surgeon started the dissection no hemodynamic problems; very stable.The customer reports acute respiratory increase peak pressure 15mmhg, without cause, immediately afterwards co2 drop so again with acute drop in blood pressure of 130/85 to 50/35.The customer reports that this could however not be explained by a newly constructed pneumoperitoneum.'the customer reports that the surgeon was informed, no changes in intra -abdominal pressure.However, the customer reports it is inevitable that there are strong increase in intra- abdominal pressure occurred; supposedly seen big swings and blood pressure ventilation pressures clearly.The customer reports that this can be allegedly observed from the trends in the anesthesia file.The customer reports that there are to their knowledge no complications occurred in the patient due to these two phases of low acute venous return with low output as a result.The customer reports that these could not be anticipated and not in relation with a new installed pneumoperitoneum of 14mmhg.The customer reports that the combination of changes both airway pressure and decreased venous return indicate that the insufflator allegedly realized a higher pressure and showed on the screen.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported device was not received for investigation; therefore the reported failure cannot be confirmed.The complaint will be closed without a detailed investigation report and based on probable root cause.In the event that the device is received, the complaint will be reopened, a full evaluation will be conducted, and the investigation will be updated with the new results.Probable root cause for the reported failure involving this device could have been probably caused by: bad lpu/hpu, bad pressure sensors or pressure control valves, use error, over due for calibration.In sum, the reported failure could not be confirmed since the device was not received at stryker endoscopy for investigation.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the anesthetist experienced problems during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Within the first two minutes, tachycardia and a fall in blood pressure was observed with low output.It was further reported that a severe hypotension out of proportion compared with the usual hypotension due to pneumoperitoneum.The company representative assumed that the patient was tied.Once the surgeon started the dissection no hemodynamic problems; very stable.The customer reports acute respiratory increase peak pressure 15mmhg, without cause, immediately afterwards co2 drop so again with acute drop in blood pressure of 130/85 to 50/35.The customer reports that this could; however, not be explained by a newly constructed pneumoperitoneum.'the customer reports that the surgeon was informed, no changes in intra -abdominal pressure.However, the customer reports it is inevitable that there are strong increase in intra- abdominal pressure occurred; supposedly seen big swings and blood pressure ventilation pressures clearly.The customer reports that this can be allegedly observed from the trends in the anesthesia file.The customer reports that there are to their knowledge no complications occurred in the patient due to these two phases of low acute venous return with low output as a result.The customer reports that these could not be anticipated and not in relation with a new installed pneumoperitoneum of 14mmhg.The customer reports that the combination of changes both airway pressure and decreased venous return indicate that the insufflator allegedly realized a higher pressure and showed on the screen.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information will be provided once the investigation has been completed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PNEUMO SURE INCL. MANUAL: EN
Type of Device
INSUFFLATOR, LAPAROSCOPIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER ENDOSCOPY-SAN JOSE
5900 optical court
san jose CA 95138
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER ENDOSCOPY-SAN JOSE
5900 optical court
san jose CA 95138
Manufacturer Contact
thomas shafer
5900 optical court
san jose, CA 95138
4087542000
MDR Report Key3775147
MDR Text Key4672912
Report Number0002936485-2014-00269
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HIF
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeBE
PMA/PMN Number
K063367
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/30/2013
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number620040601SSP
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/30/2013
Initial Date FDA Received04/28/2014
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/20/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-