• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AV-TEMECULA-CT RX ACCULINK CAROTID STENT SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AV-TEMECULA-CT RX ACCULINK CAROTID STENT SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 1011343-40
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Atrial Tachycardia (1731); Stenosis (2263)
Event Date 03/13/2013
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that an acculink stent was implanted in a right internal carotid artery and the same day, the patient had a non-occlusive deep vein thrombosis (dvt) (ischemia) and supraventricular tachycardia (svt) (atrial tachycardia).Xarelto medication was given and both the dvt and svt resolved approximately one month later.Additionally, approximately 11 months after the index procedure, on (b)(6) 2014 there was in-stent restenosis found of the target lesion.The patient was hospitalized and an endarterectomy was done on (b)(6) 2014 and the implanted acculink stent was removed from the patients anatomy.Reportedly, the patient stopped her plavix 3 months prior.There was no additional information provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The device is expected to be returned for evaluation.It has not yet been received.A follow up report will be submitted with all relevant information.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Evaluation summary: the stent was returned for analysis.The reported patient effects could not be confirmed with the returned stent.A review of the lot history record revealed no non-conformances that would have contributed to the reported event.The stent implant was sent to the fluoroscopy lab for evaluation.The fluoroscopy image was review by a abbott vascular clinical specialist.The results note that there are two stents in the image; the larger stent is located in the common carotid.The second is in the internal carotid.At the location of overlap the stents are constricted.It appears that tissue and possibly calcium are restricting full stent expansion.There was no reported device malfunction.The reported patient effect of stenosis is a known observed and potential patient effects as listed in the rx acculink, domestic, instructions for use.Although a conclusive cause for the reported patient effect, and the relationship to the product, if any, cannot be determined, there is no indication of a product quality deficiency.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product deficiency.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RX ACCULINK CAROTID STENT SYSTEM
Type of Device
CAROTID STENT SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
AV-TEMECULA-CT
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 462
Manufacturer (Section G)
ABBOTT VASCULAR, TEMECULA, CA USA REG# 2024168
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 462
Manufacturer Contact
connie speck
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key3778836
MDR Text Key4360792
Report Number2024168-2014-02690
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P040012
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Study,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/04/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/31/2014
Device Catalogue Number1011343-40
Device Lot Number2060461
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/25/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/03/2014
Initial Date FDA Received04/29/2014
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received09/08/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/01/2012
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age64 YR
Patient Weight86
-
-