MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BATTLE CREEK EQUIPMENT THERMOPHORE AUTOMATIC HEAT PACK; ELECTRIC HEAT PACK

Model Number 195

Device Problem Insufficient Information (3190)

Patient Problem No Information (3190)

Event Date 03/10/2014

Event Type  malfunction  

Event Description

Customer mailed in her pad with no notice.

Manufacturer Narrative

Our examination revealed that one of the terminals had been broken near a thermostat, which had compromised our double-insulated design.We also found several other internal components that wee damaged, indicating that the customer misused the pad by applying an excessive, localized force on or near the thermostat terminal.We concluded that this report was attributable to misuse by the user, and failure to follow instructions as to the care and handling of the unit.In our investigation we found: poly cover dirty or stained, cord ok, switch ok, bent/broken thermostat, thermostat discoloration, contained burn: harness.Although warning labels and instructions booklets war against sitting or laying on the product, we have a corrective action project (b)(4) underway to make the design more robust.

• Brand Name: THERMOPHORE AUTOMATIC HEAT PACK
• Type of Device: ELECTRIC HEAT PACK
• Manufacturer (Section D): BATTLE CREEK EQUIPMENT; freemont IN
• Manufacturer Contact: randy newsome ; 702 south reed street; freemont, IN 46737 ; 269626181
• MDR Report Key: 3788436
• MDR Text Key: 4430925
• Report Number: 1811605-2014-00081
• Device Sequence Number: 1
• Product Code: IRT
• Combination Product (y/n): N
• Reporter Country Code: CA
• Number of Events Reported: 1
• Summary Report (Y/N): N
• Report Source: Manufacturer
• Source Type: Consumer,User Facility
• Reporter Occupation: Not Applicable
• Type of Report: Initial
• Report Date: 04/01/2014

1 Device was Involved in the Event

1 Patient was Involved in the Event

• Is this an Adverse Event Report?: No
• Is this a Product Problem Report?: Yes
• Device Operator: Lay User/Patient
• Device Model Number: 195
• Was Device Available for Evaluation?: Device Returned to Manufacturer
• Date Returned to Manufacturer: 03/10/2014
• Is the Reporter a Health Professional?: No
• Initial Date Manufacturer Received: 03/10/2014
• Initial Date FDA Received: 04/01/2014
• Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer?: Yes
• Date Device Manufactured: 04/01/2011
• Is the Device Single Use?: No
• Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device?: No
• Patient Sequence Number: 1