Model Number MICL12.6 |
Device Problems
Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size (1583); Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
|
Patient Problems
Cataract (1766); Intraocular Pressure Increased (1937); Pain (1994); Swelling (2091); Numbness (2415)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
The reporter stated the surgeon implanted a 12.6mm micl12.6 implantable collamer lens in the patient's right eye (od) on (b)(6) 2014.The lens was explanted on (b)(6) 2014 due to excessive vaulting, elevated intraocular pressure (43mm hg) and the patient complained of pain, numbness and swelling of the face.There was some cortical change (opacity) in the eye.The lens was exchanged for a shorter lens and the intraocular pressure was 24mm hg.The patient is doing well - 20/25 uc.The reporter stated the cause of the vaulting was the patient's measurements were borderline and the surgeon decided to use the longer lens (surgeon's decision).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Evaluation codes: method - work order search.Results - a lens work order search was performed and no similar complaints were found within the work order.Visual inspection of the returned product found no visible damage to the lens.The lens was returned in liquid.Conclusions - (no conclusion can be drawn): based on the complaint history, work order search and the evaluation of the returned product, a specific root cause of the event could not be determined.(b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Results: the lens was rehydrated in bss for re-measurement.The lens length was measured and the result of the measurement was compared against the original value and the lens was found to be in specification.(b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Conclusions: based on the complaint history, work order search, medical review and the evaluation of the returned product, the most likely cause of the event was procedure related factor (biocalculation/user error).(b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Method: medical review.Results: per medical review - reportedly icl (12.6 mm) was explanted/exchanged for a shorter length icl (12.1 mm) one week postoperatively to address lens vaulting and subsequent elevated iop.After uneventful secondary intervention patient status improved and uva was 20/25.According to the report from the facility, dated on (b)(6) 2014, the most likely cause of the event was procedure related factor (biocalculation/user error).Given the information that after implantation of a shorter lens, the overvaulting resolved, this event was not device related in origin.Conclusions: based on the complaint history, work order search, medical review and the evaluation of the returned product, the most likely cause of the event was procedure related factor (biocalculation/user error).(b)(4).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|