• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: HALT MEDICAL INC. ACESSA HANDPIECE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

HALT MEDICAL INC. ACESSA HANDPIECE Back to Search Results
Model Number 2000
Device Problems No Display/Image (1183); Material Separation (1562)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 03/07/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
During the course of the investigation of a loss of thermocouple readings during a case on (b)(6) 2014, first preliminary investigation pointed to a possible simple error in manufacturing like a lack of contact point caused by, possibly, the thin wires separating from the tip, etc.It turned out on (b)(6) 2014, that the loss of the reading is due to a series of events where in there is an anatomy issue with an unstable, "rolling" fibroid which caused the physician (who was in her second case and still being proctored) to move the handpiece in and out of the fibroid, unknowingly manipulating and twisting the handpiece while partly deployed.This then caused severe stresses to the needles specially one of the needles that ended up breaking.This broken needle then jammed at the distal end causing internal stresses to the slider brackets causing it to break loose which made it conducive for the thermocouple wires to break and display no temperature readings.Therefore, the factors contributing to the root cause of the needle breaking comprised of: anatomy of the fibroid - unstable, rolling fibroid, which are usually difficult for new physicians to stabilize.A doctor who is still new to the procedure, having most likely inadvertently twisted and manipulated the handpiece while partially deployed.The same doctor continued the case with a new handpiece and this time were able to treat the fibroid without any issues.The procedure went well and there were no issues reported regarding the patient's health during or after the procedure at this time after at least about 2-3 follow-ups after the case has been completed.The proctor continues to have communications with the trainee to ensure no other issues have come up regarding the case.So far the doctor and patient related to the case has not exhibited or shown any dissatisfaction with the device or the procedure.The issue was not repeated again with this doctor in subsequent fibroid treatments.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Training program already states not to manipulate or twist, etc.When the handpiece's needles are deployed.Re-creation of the issue showed that this is a definite case factor in the needle breaking issue.This combined with the constant moving and instability of the target fibroid, caused unnecessary stresses to the device's nitinol needle, which then bent excessively to the point of breakage.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ACESSA HANDPIECE
Type of Device
ACESSA HANDPIECE
Manufacturer (Section D)
HALT MEDICAL INC.
131 sand creek road suite b
brentwood CA 94513
Manufacturer Contact
clarisa tate
131 sand creek road suite b
brentwood, CA 94513
9252710626
MDR Report Key3807271
MDR Text Key19768671
Report Number3006443171-2014-00002
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HFG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K121858
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/14/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/10/2015
Device Model Number2000
Device Catalogue Number2000
Device Lot NumberT130101
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/29/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/29/2014
Initial Date FDA Received03/20/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/01/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-