|
Catalog Number ST6L |
Device Problem
Insufficient Information (3190)
|
Patient Problems
Abscess (1690); Fistula (1862); Incontinence (1928); Unspecified Infection (1930); Inflammation (1932); Pain (1994)
|
Event Date 11/03/2006 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to gore that a patient alleges to have experienced infections, pain, incontinence, fistulas, inflammation, and abscess after having been implanted with a gore-tex vascular graft in the vaginal area.Reason for implant was cystocele.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Review of device manufacturing record history confirmed device met pre-release specifications.Ifu indications for use states the following: gore-tex vascular grafts are intended for use as vascular prostheses for replacement or bypass of diseased vessels in patients suffering occlusive or aneurysmal diseases, in trauma patients requiring vascular replacement, for dialysis access, or for other vascular procedures.
|
|
Event Description
|
On (b)(6) 1998, patient presented with cystocele and stress incontinence.Anterior repair and pereyra procedure with cystoscopy was performed.A gore-tex vascular graft was implanted in the vaginal mucosa.On (b)(6) 2006, it was noted that no foreign bodies or fistula was observed during cystoscopy.On (b)(6) 2006, two prolene sutures were found and removed during the suprapubic exploration and cystoscopy of bladder.During a cystoscopy on (b)(6) 2006, a gore-tex material was found that was implanted during a urethropexy performed years ago.Operative report dated (b)(6) 2006 states that patient presented with a recurrent pelvic abscess.Upon dissection, a granulomatous-type inflammatory tract was found and carried down to about 1cm of the gore-tex graft bolster.The tract was removed and debridement was done above and below the fascia.The wound was irrigated with kantrex antibiotic solution.A drain was placed.No complications were noted.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The sterilization records for lot# 495282 are unavailable for review.Based on a manufacture date of 10/18/1995, the required record retention period of 10 years have been exceeded.Although documents are unavailable, standard manufacturing procedures require lot history review before release of the sterilization batch to ensure compliance with device specifications.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|