Model Number H749236310020 |
Device Problem
Crack (1135)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 04/22/2014 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the shaft had a crack.The target lesion was located in the left anterior descending artery.A 1.25 mm and 1.50 mm rotalink plus were used in the atherectomy procedure.Platforming was done successfully prior to insertion of the devices into the patient.During the procedure, it was noted that the 1.25 mm burr stalled in the left main artery.The device was replaced with the 1.50 mm burr, however the device also stalled.The device was removed and it was further noted there was a crack in the black portion of the burr shaft.The procedure was completed with this device.There were no patient complications reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device evaluated by mfr: it is indicated that the device will not be returned for evaluation.A review of the batch history, historical trending, and similar complaint trending review for the product family will be conducted.If there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.(b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Corrected: upn from h749236310030 to h749236310020, catalog/model # from 23631-003 to 23631-002.Device evaluated by mfr.: the device was returned for evaluation.A visual examination of the device noted that the strain relief of the catheter was free from damage.The handshake connection was inspected and no damage was noted.No issues were noted during a tug test.A tear in the sheath around the distal coil was found during wet test and saline was not reaching the end of the sheath but was being expelled through the sheath.The device was dismantled and the ultem was found to be melted.There was also corrosion noted around the turbine of the device.Corrosion was also noted around the burr.It is likely the corrosion occurred due to the presence of saline around these areas while in transit back for investigation.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The most probable root cause is considered handling damage as the event most likely occurred prior to direct patient contact.(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the shaft had a crack.The target lesion was located in the left anterior descending artery.A 1.25 mm and 1.50 mm rotalink¿ plus were used in the atherectomy procedure.Platforming was done successfully prior to insertion of the devices into the patient.During the procedure, it was noted that the 1.25 mm burr stalled in the left main artery.The device was replaced with the 1.50 mm burr, however the device also stalled.The device was removed and it was further noted there was a crack in the black portion of the burr shaft.The procedure was completed with this device.There were no patient complications reported.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|