• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. BRACHYVISION; SYSTEM, PLANNING, RADIATION THERAPY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. BRACHYVISION; SYSTEM, PLANNING, RADIATION THERAPY Back to Search Results
Lot Number V.11.0.41
Device Problems Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Injury (2348); Reaction (2414)
Event Date 03/25/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Two patients were treated for prostate cancer with hdr brachytherapy.Several weeks after treatment, the physician observed a strong skin reaction to the perineum for both patients.Patient #1 was treated on (b)(6) 2014.The physicists measured the applicator length (needle + transfer guide tube (part numbers pending)) to be 136cm.The default brachyvision applicator length of 130cm was not edited by the customer to equal 136cm prior to treatment.The result was delivery of all of the dwell positions 6 cm inferior to the intended locations.Details regarding patient #1 reported under mfr report #3003793371-2014-00001.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A varian field service engineer went to the clinic and made tests on the after loader regarding source positioning and checked the event logs (no fault event on related treatment dates).All of the tests showed that there was no fault with the after loader itself.The field service engineer and the physicist then reproduced the treatment using the same plan used for one of the affected patients and found an off-set of approximately 6 cm in respect to the intended target position.The original training was delivered more than 14 years ago to one of the physicists at the site.That particular physicist left the site a few years later.Additional training was conducted by varian personnel in 2013, with the a different physicist who did not participate in the original training.Last month, that physicist left the site and a new physicist was hired.The remaining 2 physicists have never been on a varian training.They have treated 5 patients since the physicist, who had been trained by varian, left on (b)(6) (3 gyn and 2 prostate patients).For the gyn patients, they changed the distance to 120 cm (in brachyvision), which is the measured applicator length.For the prostate patients they measured about 136 cm for the applicator length and did not change the length on the brachyvision plan to match.It is the conclusion of this investigation that the primary and root cause of this issue is user error.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BRACHYVISION
Type of Device
SYSTEM, PLANNING, RADIATION THERAPY
Manufacturer (Section D)
VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
3100 hansen way
palo alto CA 94304
Manufacturer (Section G)
VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS FINLAND OY
helsinki
FI  
Manufacturer Contact
mark kattmann
501 locust avenue
suite 1
charlottesville, VA 22902
4349518632
MDR Report Key3854893
MDR Text Key4621568
Report Number3003793371-2014-00002
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MUJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeBR
PMA/PMN Number
K102011
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/02/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Lot NumberV.11.0.41
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/02/2014
Initial Date FDA Received05/27/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/01/2012
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-