A varian field service engineer went to the clinic and made tests on the after loader regarding source positioning and checked the event logs (no fault event on related treatment dates).All of the tests showed that there was no fault with the after loader itself.The field service engineer and the physicist then reproduced the treatment using the same plan used for one of the affected patients and found an off-set of approximately 6 cm in respect to the intended target position.The original training was delivered more than 14 years ago to one of the physicists at the site.That particular physicist left the site a few years later.Additional training was conducted by varian personnel in 2013, with the a different physicist who did not participate in the original training.Last month, that physicist left the site and a new physicist was hired.The remaining 2 physicists have never been on a varian training.They have treated 5 patients since the physicist, who had been trained by varian, left on (b)(6) (3 gyn and 2 prostate patients).For the gyn patients, they changed the distance to 120 cm (in brachyvision), which is the measured applicator length.For the prostate patients they measured about 136 cm for the applicator length and did not change the length on the brachyvision plan to match.It is the conclusion of this investigation that the primary and root cause of this issue is user error.
|