During a transaortic tavr procedure, post deployment the 26mm sapien valve position was good (50:50 a/v) with no central aortic insufficiency (cai) and moderate paravalvular leak (pvl).The valve was post-dilated with 1.5cc extra volume added to the balloon.After post dilatation the valve was noted to have 1-2+ cai, so it was decided to implant a 2nd 26mm sapien valve within the 1st one.The 2nd valve was deployed almost in the same position as the 1st one (just a little bit lower), with no pvl and no cai.The patient remained stable throughout the procedure.
|
Per the instructions for use, valve regurgitation is a potential adverse event associated with bioprosthetic heart valves and the transcatheter aortic valve replacement (tavr) procedure.There are multiple patient and procedural factors that alone or in combination can cause or contribute to valve regurgitation including malposition of the valve, impingement of a leaflet due to the guide wire, over inflation of the deployment balloon, post dilation of the implanted valve, and slow recovery of adequate ventricular flow post valve deployment and rapid pacing.All of these factors have the potential to contribute to suboptimal coaptation of the sapien valve leaflets and cause central aortic insufficiency.Occasionally there are cases where the root cause of the regurgitation cannot be determined.The thv training manuals instruct the operator on proper positioning and deployment of the valve, including all procedural and anatomical considerations.The patient screening manual instructs the operator on proper native valve leaflet assessment, taking into consideration the length, bulkiness and distribution of calcium on the native leaflets to determine whether valve performance will be impaired.During the manufacturing process, all sapien valves are 100% visually inspected for defects and 100% tested for coaptation prior to release for distribution.This makes it highly unlikely that a manufacturing defect or device malfunction would contribute to the event.In this case, it appears that the event was related to procedural factors.According to the information provided post deployment the sapien valve was post dilated with an additional 1.5cc of volume, resulting in the 1-2+ cai.There was no allegation or indication of a device malfunction related to a manufacturing defect.The ifu and training manuals have been reviewed and no inadequacies have been identified with regards to warnings, contraindications, and the directions/conditions for the successful use of the device.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a (b)(4) basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this (b)(4) review.No corrective or preventative actions are required.
|