• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK, INC. BEACON TIP ROYAL FLUSH PLUS FLUSH CATHETER; DQO CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK, INC. BEACON TIP ROYAL FLUSH PLUS FLUSH CATHETER; DQO CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC Back to Search Results
Catalog Number HNR4.0-35-100-P-10S-PIG
Device Problem Tip breakage (1638)
Patient Problem Nonresorbable materials, unretrieved in body (2276)
Event Date 05/26/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
A (b)(6) male patient experienced evar against aaa on (b)(6) 2014.A delivery system of a stentgraft (detail: unk) was advanced below renal artery from right cfa and then, so as to perform angiography before stentgraft deployment, the complaint catheter was advanced below renal artery over a wire guide from left cfa.After the wire guide was retrieved, angiography was conducted through the catheter and the catheter was withdrawn out of the body.Then, the stentgraft was deployed in the lesion successfully.However, when the physician checked the lesion under fluoroscopic control after the deployment, it was noticed that the tip of the catheter had separated and was caught in the space between the stentgraft and the wall of the aorta.Although the separated segment still remains in the body, no adverse effects to the patient have been observed by now.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Product was returned in an opened and used condition.A visual inspection noted that the distal tip had separated from the catheter shaft.The separation appeared to be a smooth break due to a brittle separation.A review of the complaint history, the ifu, inspection instructions and a visual inspection of the device were performed.A final inspection for angiographic catheters verifies surface of catheter is free of damage, excess bumps or roughness, and foreign matter.This product is shipped with an ifu which states under precautions: "due to thinwall construction, extreme care must be exercised during manipulation and withdrawal.Catheter insertion through a synthetic vascular graft should be avoided whenever possible." "the possible whiplash effect of the long, soft catheter tip must be considered during selective angiography." the patient event information stated: "when the physician checked the lesion under fluoroscopic control after the deployment, it was noticed that the tip of the catheter had separated and was caught in the space between the stentgraft and the wall of the aorta." it is possible that the device saw resistance beyond its design.The appropriate internal personnel have been notified and will continue to monitor for similar events.The risk assessment was used to access the risk and a capa has been initiated to help reduce/alleviate this failure mode.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BEACON TIP ROYAL FLUSH PLUS FLUSH CATHETER
Type of Device
DQO CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK, INC.
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
rita harden, director
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key3902215
MDR Text Key22001497
Report Number1820334-2014-00255
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DQO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/28/2014,05/26/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/30/2016
Device Catalogue NumberHNR4.0-35-100-P-10S-PIG
Device Lot Number4461704
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/03/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date05/26/2014
Device Age9 MO
Event Location Hospital
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/27/2014
Initial Date FDA Received06/24/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured08/26/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age83 YR
Patient Weight38
-
-