It was reported that the patient was having muscle spasms and that her generator will be revised because it is at a different angle.It was reported that it is believed that the angle the generator is at is causing pain.The device was disabled on (b)(6) 2014 and the patient was referred for surgery for patient comfort; however, it was also a precaution to make sure the generator isn't "misfiring" and cause a serious injury.On (b)(6), the patient came back in and the device was deactivated.The patient was referred for surgery and it was for patient comfort however it was also as a precaution to make sure that the generator isn't "misfiring" and could cause a serious injury.(b)(4) provided the system diagnostic results as ok impedance 3620 ohms and ifi - no.The patient underwent generator revision on (b)(6) 2014 due to a 90 pound weight loss.The surgeon reportedly did not identify any problems with the lead when the generator was revised.There was no history of trauma to the area or falls.X-rays were taken and sent to manufacturer for review.Based on the x-rays received, the report of device migration and discomfort cannot be analyzed.There was nothing seen that would indicate there was any damage to the generator or lead; however, the presence of a micro-fracture in the lead cannot be ruled out.As the entire lead could not be assessed, continuity in that portion of the lead cannot be confirmed.It was reported that the patient would be seen to have the device programmed back on.No additional relevant information has been received to date.
|