Vencken and colleagues suggest that brca1 and brca2 patients who develop ovarian cancer are more responsive to platinum-based chemotherapy than patients without brca1/2 mutations who develop sporadic ovarian cancer.This presents an opportunity for personalizing the treatment for ovarian cancer.Unfortunately, it is difficult for this info to be included in the label for cisplatin because there seems to be no clinical trial data presented to the fda about personalizing cisplatin treatment based on the brca1/2 mutations.Nevertheless, it is important to the fda to prevent misuse and misinterpretation of the brca1/2 tests.Therefore this info should be provided to patients and practitioners who ultimately interpret the results of the brca1/2 tests after a purchase of that test.As an example of a product use error, brca1/2 patients and their doctors may sometimes have the false impression that platinum compounds are ineffective in patients who test positive for brca1/2.As a consequence, those patients are not given platinum compounds despite that they may benefit from that treatment.Table 3 of vencken et al., suggests that progressive disease would be a consequence of using non-platinum-based chemotherapy.Therefore, i propose that the brca1/2 tests include a warning clarifying that patients who test positive for brca1 or brca2 do not necessarily have cancer that is resistant to platinum compounds.Vencken, p.M.L.H., mieke kriege, d.Hoogwerf, s.Beugelink, m.E.L.Van der burg, m.J.Hooning, e.M.Berns et al."chemosensitivity and outcome of brca1-and brca2-associated ovarian cancer patients after first-line chemotherapy compared with sporadic ovarian cancer patients".Annals of oncology 22, no.6 (2011): 1346-1352.
|