• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STAAR SURGICAL COMPANY VISIAN ICL (IMPLANTABLE COLLAMER LENS); INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STAAR SURGICAL COMPANY VISIAN ICL (IMPLANTABLE COLLAMER LENS); INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number MICL13.2
Device Problems Unintended Movement (3026); Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problems Intraocular Pressure Increased (1937); Swelling (2091); Blurred Vision (2137)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
The reporter stated the surgeon explanted a 13.2mm micl13.2 implantable collamer lens on (b)(6) 2014 due to the lens having been implanted upside down.The patient complained of blurred vision and the intraocular pressure was elevated.The patient reported for four days post-op after the initial surgery, there was swelling in his eye.A new incision was created to explant the icl and another same model/diopter lens was implanted.There was some corneal edema post-op but the patient is now stable and pressure is good.The icl was initially implanted by another physician in (b)(6).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Pt weight: unk.Date of event: unk.(b)(4).Method - work order search.Results - a lens work order search was performed and no similar complaints were found within the work order.Visual inspection of the returned product found one haptic torn, with a piece torn off and missing.The lens was returned in liquid.Conclusions - based on the complaint history, work order search and the evaluation of the returned product, a specific root cause of the event could not be determined.(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Method: medical review.Results: per medical review - reportedly, icl was explanted/exchanged three weeks postoperatively to address user error (upside-down implantation) and subsequent postoperative sequelae (elevated iop, corneal edema).Lens was explanted by a different surgeon and according to his report, dated on (b)(6) 2014, upon icl exchange for another icl, of a same size and diopter, patient status improved and iop was within the normal range.The dfu under visian icl handling precautions instructs physicians that: "7.The visian icl should be carefully examined in the operating room prior to implantation ".Conclusions: based on the complaint history, work order search, medical review and the evaluation of the returned product, a possible cause of the event is user error (upside-down implantation).(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VISIAN ICL (IMPLANTABLE COLLAMER LENS)
Type of Device
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
STAAR SURGICAL COMPANY
haupstrasse 104
nidau, CH-25 60
SZ  CH-2560
Manufacturer (Section G)
STAAR SURGICAL COMPANY
haupstrasse 104
nidau, CH-2 560
SZ   CH-2560
Manufacturer Contact
althea watson
1911 walker avenue
monrovia, CA 91016
6263037902
MDR Report Key3959040
MDR Text Key16452131
Report Number2023826-2014-00494
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MTA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P030016
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/25/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date05/31/2015
Device Model NumberMICL13.2
Other Device ID NumberDIOPTER -8.5
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/11/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/12/2014
Initial Date FDA Received07/28/2014
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received09/26/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/07/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age28 YR
-
-