BIOSENSE WEBSTER, INC (IRWINDALE) PREFACE® GUIDING SHEATH WITH MULTIPURPOSE CURVE; INTRODUCER, CATHETER
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 301803M |
Device Problem
Material Perforation (2205)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 07/09/2014 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a patient, underwent a procedure with a preface® guiding sheath with multipurpose curve and a perforation on dilator device malfunction occurred.At the moment of the needle passage, this one crossed the dilator.There was no patient consequence.The procedure was completed successfully with a similar-like device.As per the information reported, the needle is not directed in the intended direction and this may lead to be a potential risk for the patient.Therefore, this complaint is reportable.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If additional information is received regarding this event, a supplemental 3500a report will be submitted to the fda.(b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Multiple attempts have been made to request for the complaint product to be returned for analysis.Product was not returned for investigation as initially reported.As the lot # 17021493 was provided, the device history records was reviewed and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the dhr review verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.(b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A) the bwi failure analysis lab received the device for evaluation on november 2, 2014.The analysis has begun but is not completed at this time.B) manufacturer's reference # (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturer's ref.No: (b)(4) it was reported that a patient, underwent a procedure with a preface® guiding sheath with multipurpose curve and a perforation on dilator device malfunction occurred.At the moment of the needle passage, this one crossed the dilator.There was no patient consequence.The procedure was completed successfully with a similar-like device.As per the information reported, the needle is not directed in the intended direction and this may lead to be a potential risk for the patient.The preface sheath and vessel dilator were returned for analysis.The needle used was not returned by the customer.Both were visually inspected and a puncture was found at 1.2 cm from distal tip end.Then per the reported event, the vessel dilator was compared with the shape master and it was within the limits.In addition, a sem test was carried out over the damaged section and the results showed evidence of elongations and scratches.Internal surface of the vessel dilator did not show evidence of damages that could be related to the perforation.Damages observed suggested that the perforation was induced by an unknown object from the inside to the outside.The device history record (dhr) was reviewed and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the dhr review verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.The customer complaint has been verified.However, it remains unknown how the needle damaged the dilator.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|