• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - SPENCER RX CYTOLOGY BRUSH; ENDOSCOPIC CYTOLOGY BRUSH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - SPENCER RX CYTOLOGY BRUSH; ENDOSCOPIC CYTOLOGY BRUSH Back to Search Results
Model Number M00545000
Device Problem Bent (1059)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 07/15/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an rx cytology brush was used in the common bile duct during an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ercp) procedure performed on (b)(6) 2014.According to the complainant, during preparation, the tip of the brush was kinked.The procedure was completed with another rx cytology brush.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be stable.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Patient's exact age is unknown; however, it was reported that the patient was over the age of 18.Reported event of brush bent.The device has not been received for analysis.Upon receipt and completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental mdr will be filed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation results: visual evaluation of the returned device found bristled portion of the brush to be bent on an angle with no visible residue.Functional evaluation revealed device to be extended to about 4.5cm but was unable to fully retract.The complaint that the brush bent was confirmed, brush was found to be bent and was unable to retract due to the device condition.The failure was noted during preparation and while outside patient.Therefore, the most probable root cause for this event is determined to be ¿handling damage¿.A review of the device history record (dhr) confirmed that the device met all material, assembly, and product specifications at the time of release to distribution.A search of the complaint database confirmed that no other complaints exist for the specified batch.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an rx cytology brush was used in the common bile duct during an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ercp) procedure performed on (b)(6) 2014.According to the complainant, during preparation, the tip of the brush was kinked.The procedure was completed with another rx cytology brush.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be stable.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RX CYTOLOGY BRUSH
Type of Device
ENDOSCOPIC CYTOLOGY BRUSH
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - SPENCER
780 brookside drive
spencer IN 47460
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - SPENCER
780 brookside drive
spencer IN 47460
Manufacturer Contact
nancy cutino
100 boston scientific way
marlborough, MA 01752
5086834000
MDR Report Key3985254
MDR Text Key17162109
Report Number3005099803-2014-02705
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FDX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeTW
PMA/PMN Number
K930348
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/15/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Nurse
Device Expiration Date12/09/2015
Device Model NumberM00545000
Device Catalogue Number4500
Device Lot Number16595053
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/15/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/26/2014
Initial Date FDA Received08/06/2014
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received09/12/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/12/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-