It was reported that during an ablation procedure, the patient voided the bladder on the procedure table and the grounding pad to the stockert 70 was soaked in urine.Several ablations took place until the issue was noticed.The grounding pad was replaced and the issue was resolved.No injury to the patient is noted.Upon following up with the customer, bwi received additional information which is now indicative of a reportable event.It was stated at end of an afib case noted that ablation pad had become dislodged and caused burn to lower back.Plastics surgery consulted on arrival to recovery area.The causality of adverse event was possibly device related.The size of the indifferent electrode used during the case was 9¿.The location of the indifferent electrode was lower back posterior to left scapula.Multiple attempts were done to request for further details.However no additional information has been provided.
|
(b)(4).It was reported that during an ablation procedure, the patient voided the bladder on the procedure table and the grounding pad to the stockert 70 was soaked in urine.Several ablations took place until the issue was noticed.The grounding pad was replaced and the issue was resolved.No injury to the patient is noted.It was stated at end of an afib case noted that ablation pad had become dislodged and caused burn to lower back.Plastics surgery consulted on arrival to recovery area.The issue was not duplicated.The device was evaluated.Nis and ecg board were found defected during pm.Defected parts were replaced.Ep cooler was also upgraded.The device was subjected to the preventive maintenance, safety and functional testing and all tests passed.The defected parts were not contributed to adverse event.The device history record was reviewed and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the dhr review verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.
|