• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: QED INC MAXENON XI 300; LIGHT, SURGICAL, FIBER OPTIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

QED INC MAXENON XI 300; LIGHT, SURGICAL, FIBER OPTIC Back to Search Results
Model Number 3010
Device Problems Thermal Decomposition of Device (1071); Device Emits Odor (1425)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 04/02/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
While performing mastectomy, surgeon used lighted retractor with storz light cord that was attached to light source.A few minutes later, burning smell came from light source and light cord.Tip of light cord where it was plugged into light source looked burned.What was the original intended procedure: bilateral mastectomy and reconstruction with breast expander.Device usage problem: device malfunction-that is, the device did not do what it was supposed to do.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device #2.Illuminator, fiber optic, surgical field.Brand name: storz bfw illuminator, age of device: do not know, single use device: no, serial #(b)(4), model#: bfw 3010, returned to mfr: no, available for evaluation: yes, procode: unk.The maxenon xi 300, x/n (b)(4) was sold(b)(4) 20 07 to bfw inc an has no history of complaints or repairs performed at the manufacturer facility.It is designed with an intended use as a fiber optic headlight system.The description of the event/problem states that the device was being used in a surgical procedure with a lighted retractor, which is not the intended use of the device.The report states that the device was subjected to evaluation and testing on (b)(6) 2014.The evaluation says the fiber optic cable used in the procedure was from an unknown manufacturer.The findings listed in the report verify that there were no malfunctions of the power supply or internal wiring.When connected to a bfw headlight and cable, it ran for three hours with no problems.The manufacturer agrees with the test lab regarding possible contributing factors.The maxenon xi operation manual states that the fiber optic cable must be rinsed free of soaking/disinfectant solution and dried before plugging into a port.Bfw inc recommends fiber optic cables made by the original manufacturer as identified on the port turret.Refurbished cables may malfunction resulting in damage to the light source and/or cable.If using the light source with a non-bfw product, it is the user's responsibility to assure the compatibility.The medwatch report leads the manufacturer to conclude that the device wasn't used as intended by the device design.A fiber optic cable failure caused the problem.The use facility failed to adhere to warnings and recommendations in the operation manual.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MAXENON XI 300
Type of Device
LIGHT, SURGICAL, FIBER OPTIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
QED INC
750 enterprise dr.
lexington KY 40510
Manufacturer (Section G)
BAUSCH & LOMB, INC.
1400 north goodman st.
rochester NY 14606
Manufacturer Contact
ira cooper
750 enterprise dr.
lexington, KY 40510
8592310338
MDR Report Key4040147
MDR Text Key4862316
Report Number1037039-2014-00001
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FST
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other
Reporter Occupation Risk Manager
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/23/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number3010
Device Lot Number30-
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/09/2014
Initial Date FDA Received06/04/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured02/01/2007
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age44 YR
-
-