• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ADVANCED STERILIZATION PRODUCTS STERRAD 100NX CASSETTE; STERRAD 100NX STERILIZER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ADVANCED STERILIZATION PRODUCTS STERRAD 100NX CASSETTE; STERRAD 100NX STERILIZER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 10144
Device Problem Chemical Problem (2893)
Patient Problem Skin Irritation (2076)
Event Date 08/07/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer date: 04/09/2014.\ asp investigation summary: the investigation included a review of the batch record review, service history, trending of the product malfunction code, failure mode and effects analysis (fmea), and system hazard user misuse analysis (shuma).Method: service history, trending, fmea, and shuma reviewed.¿the batch record review was reviewed and no issues relating the failure mode were noted.The batch met manufacturer specifications at the time of release.¿the service history for the past six months ((b)(4) 2014) did not identify any significant trend.¿the trend for the product malfunction code of skin reaction was assessed from (b)(6) 2014.The risk is considered "acceptable after being reduced as low as possible." ¿ trending analysis by lot number was reviewed from (b)(4) 2014.There were no similar incidents within this time frame.¿the fmea revealed the risk priority number (rpn) scores are considered to be at an acceptable level.¿the shuma indicates the risk is "broadly acceptable." testing was not performed as there was no product returned.An asp field service engineer went onsite and found no evidence of the customer's claim of "popped cassette." no problem was found with the sterrad® unit as well.The severity of the issue was defined as "moderate." review of tracking and trending data did not reveal a trend that needed further investigation.
 
Event Description
A facility reported a healthcare worker (hcw) came in contact with hydrogen peroxide while loading a cassette into a sterrad® 100nx.The hcw was wearing unspecified personal protective equipment (ppe) and experienced "burning hot tingling, itching" on her arm, hand, wrist and finger for 45 minutes.The hcw flushed her hand with water for 15 minutes and washed it with soap.The hcw then visited the onsite doctor who administered first aid and did not prescribe any treatment.This event is being reported as a malfunction report subsequent to a serious injury event dated (b)(6) 2014.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Ni.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
STERRAD 100NX CASSETTE
Type of Device
STERRAD 100NX STERILIZER
Manufacturer (Section D)
ADVANCED STERILIZATION PRODUCTS
33 technology drive
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
ADVANCED STERILIZATION PRODUCTS
33 technology drive
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
ginny stamberger
irvine, CA 92618
9497893837
MDR Report Key4045386
MDR Text Key13024856
Report Number2084725-2014-00285
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MLR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K071345
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/07/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/04/2015
Device Catalogue Number10144
Device Lot Number14D047
Other Device ID Number10144
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/02/2015
Initial Date FDA Received08/28/2014
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/10/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured04/01/2014
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age74 YR
-
-