(b)(6).Complaint conclusion: the device was returned for analysis.The sl-10 microcatheter and the rhv valve were not returned.The unit was returned unsheathed with the unprotected coil exposed.Located 65.0 cm off the proximal end is a kink on the core wire.Distal to the resheathing tool, the dpu protrudes outside the sheath at the kink.Located at the distal tip of the knife, the sheath has severe mechanical damage.The coil's socket ring is off to the side and lodged down inside the pet angle ring.There are copious amounts of tissue adhering to the coil.There are two sections of coil that were severely damaged.The distal section of the coil is intact, but full of tissue.The coil's ball tip has tissue adhering to the surface.The complaint could not be confirmed due to the condition of the returned device and without return of the microcatheter.The most likely root cause of the coil becoming stuck inside the microcatheter was due to distal interference.The contributing factor was probably the copious amounts of tissue found adhering to the entire length of the coil.Although i cannot be confirmed, the blood found on the coil indicates that a continuous flush was not maintained through the microcatheter as per the instructions for use (ifu).In addition, without the return of the sl-10 microcatheter used in the procedure, it cannot be determined if this component also contributed to the complaint event.
|