(b)(6).Complaint conclusion: the unit was returned cleaned.The coil was returned only in a plastic bag packed in a box with other boxed devices.The coil was unsheathed, unprotected, and severely damaged.Located off the distal end of the marker band, there is buckling at 2mm and 1.4cm.The coil¿s socket ring has been severed at the soldered section.There was tissue adhering to the severed socket ring and at the distal tip of the soldered section.The proximal end of the coil is severely damaged and is in a multi-buckled state.There are remnants of a substance found adhering to the ball tip.Only the proximal section of the coil is damaged, the remainder of the coil is intact.The unit was too severely damaged for testing.The proximal end of both the device positioning unit (dpu) and the coil were returned severely buckled.The evidence suggests that distal interference inside the microcatheter during insertion most likely contributed to the resistance encountered.Tissue was found adhering to the coil at all the buckled sections.However, the exact source of the interference inside the microcatheter cannot be determined.In addition, without the return of the microcatheter and the hemostatic valve used in the procedure, it cannot be determined if these components contributed to the complaint event.This mdr is being submitted as part of a retrospective review as the result of a recent fda audit and with accordance to the requirments of code of federal regulations - 21 cfr part 803, medical device reporting.
|