• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICRUS ENDOVASCULAR, LLC DELTAPLUSH - CERECYTE MICROCOIL; CNV DCS COILS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICRUS ENDOVASCULAR, LLC DELTAPLUSH - CERECYTE MICROCOIL; CNV DCS COILS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number CPL10040830
Device Problem Deformation Due to Compressive Stress (2889)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 12/05/2010
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that the deltaplush coil was longer than designed.After the coil marker passed through the proximal marker of the microcatheter, the coil was still coming out form the marker band.Analysis revealed that the coil was severely damaged at the proximal section, but there was no issue with the marker band.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(6).Complaint conclusion: the coil¿s length was checked upon receipt and was found to be within the required specification of 8.0cm.The proximal end of the coil was found to be severely buckled in multiple areas.The remainder of the coil is undamaged.Located distal to the marker band, the device positioning unit¿s (dpu) tip coil section has multiple sections of severe buckling.The tip coil section was straightened to remove the buckling for inspection purposes.The marker band location was found to be 31.5mm which is within the specification range of 31 to 32mm.The coil and dpu were found to be severely buckled upon receipt.The coil¿s length and the marker band location were both found to be within engineering specifications.The buckling of the dpu reduced the marker band location in relationship to the length between the marker band and the distal tip.This buckling caused the marker band of the dpu to line up with the marker band of the microcatheter before the coil was fully delivered inside the aneurysm.The most likely root cause of the coil appearing to be longer than specification was due to the selection of the incompatible microcatheter.The increased microcatheter¿s diameter may have led to the buckling damage to the unit.For optimum performance, we recommend the following, as stated in the product instructs of use: ¿proper selection of the appropriately sized microcatheter is required to avoid damage to the micrus microcoil system and to minimize potential complications¿the micrus microcoil 10 system is compatible with microcatheters with inner lumen diameters ranging from 0.014 to 0.017 inches¿ the inner lumen of the excelsior 1018 microcatheter is 0.019.Since there was no manufacturing related issues related to the complaint, no corrective actions were taken.This mdr is being submitted as part of a retrospective review as the result of a recent fda audit and with accordance to the requirements of code of federal regulations - 21 cfr part 803, medical device reporting.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DELTAPLUSH - CERECYTE MICROCOIL
Type of Device
CNV DCS COILS
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICRUS ENDOVASCULAR, LLC
821 fox lane
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer (Section G)
CODMAN AND SHURTLEFF, INC
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer Contact
duane durbin
miami lakes, FL 33014
5088283106
MDR Report Key4056029
MDR Text Key4738502
Report Number1226348-2014-00243
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K083646
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/05/2010
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/24/2015
Device Catalogue NumberCPL10040830
Device Lot NumberG11399
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/29/2010
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/05/2010
Initial Date FDA Received09/03/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/01/2010
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-